|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{Reference Example|{{Banner DOE Reference Examples}}}} | | {{Reference Example|{{Banner DOE Reference Examples}}}} |
| This example validates the calculation of the Box-Behnken RSM method in DOE++. | | This example validates the calculation of the Box-Behnken RSM method in Weibull++. |
|
| |
|
| {{Reference_Example_Heading1}} | | {{Reference_Example_Heading1}} |
Latest revision as of 21:08, 18 September 2023
New format available! This reference is now available in a new format that offers faster page load, improved display for calculations and images and more targeted search.
As of January 2024, this Reliawiki page will not continue to be updated. Please update all links and bookmarks to the latest references at DOE examples and DOE reference examples.
This example validates the calculation of the Box-Behnken RSM method in Weibull++.
Reference Case
The data are from Example 7.5 on page 347 in the book Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments, 2nd Edition, by Raymond H. Myers and Douglas C. Montgomery, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2002.
Data
| Level (coded value)
|
Temperature (A)
|
Agitation (B)
|
Rate (C)
|
| High (+1) |
200 |
10 |
25
|
| Center (0) |
175 |
7.5 |
20
|
| Low (-1) |
150 |
5 |
15
|
The viscosity of the resin was recorded as an indirect measure of molecular weight.
| Standard order
|
A
|
B
|
C
|
Y
|
| 1 |
-1 |
-1 |
0 |
53
|
| 2 |
+1 |
-1 |
0 |
58
|
| 3 |
-1 |
+1 |
0 |
59
|
| 4 |
+1 |
+1 |
0 |
56
|
| 5 |
-1 |
0 |
-1 |
64
|
| 6 |
+1 |
0 |
-1 |
45
|
| 7 |
-1 |
0 |
+1 |
35
|
| 8 |
+1 |
0 |
+1 |
60
|
| 9 |
0 |
-1 |
-1 |
59
|
| 10 |
0 |
+1 |
-1 |
64
|
| 11 |
0 |
-1 |
+1 |
53
|
| 12 |
0 |
+1 |
+1 |
65
|
| 13 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
65
|
| 14 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
59
|
| 15 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
62
|
Result
From the book, the ANOVA table (partial sum of squares) is:
| Source
|
Partial SS
|
DF
|
Mean Square
|
F value
|
Prob > F
|
| Model |
882.48 |
9 |
98.05 |
9.57 |
0.0114
|
| A |
8 |
1 |
8.00 |
0.78 |
0.4174
|
| B |
55.12 |
1 |
55.12 |
5.38 |
0.0681
|
| C |
45.13 |
1 |
45.13 |
4.40 |
0.09
|
| [math]\displaystyle{ A^2 }[/math] |
200.83 |
1 |
200.83 |
19.59 |
0.0069
|
| [math]\displaystyle{ B^2 }[/math] |
12.98 |
1 |
12.98 |
1.27 |
0.3115
|
| [math]\displaystyle{ C^2 }[/math] |
48.52 |
1 |
48.52 |
4.73 |
0.0816
|
| AB |
16.00 |
1 |
16.00 |
1.56 |
0.2668
|
| AC |
484.00 |
1 |
484.00 |
47.22 |
0.001
|
| BC |
12.25 |
1 |
12.25 |
1.22 |
0.3241
|
| Residual |
51.25 |
5 |
10.25 |
|
|
| Lack of Fit |
33.25 |
3 |
11.08 |
1.23 |
0.4774
|
| Pure error |
18 |
2 |
9.00 |
|
|
| Cor total |
933.73 |
14 |
|
|
|
The final equation in terms of actual factors:
- [math]\displaystyle{ \begin{align}
Viscosity=-58.875+2.65 * Temp-0.65 * Agitation-11.125*Rate-0.0118*Temp^2+0.3*Agitation^2 \\
-0.145*Rate^2-0.032*Temp*Agitation+0.088*Temp*Rate+0.14*Agitation*Rate
\end{align} }[/math]
Results in DOE++
The software results match the book results. The ANOVA table is:
The final equation in terms of the actual factors is:
The maximum viscosity is shown in the following optimal solution plot.
