Grouped Per Configuration Reference Example: Difference between revisions

From ReliaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Reference Example|{{Banner RGA Reference_Examples}}}}
{{Reference Example|{{Banner RGA Reference_Examples}}|Grouped per Configuration}}
This example compares the results for grouped per configuration data.
This example compares the results for grouped per configuration data.


Revision as of 23:40, 20 June 2014

RGA Reference Examples Banner.png


New format available! This reference is now available in a new format that offers faster page load, improved display for calculations and images and more targeted search.

As of January 2024, this Reliawiki page will not continue to be updated. Please update all links and bookmarks to the latest references at RGA examples and RGA reference examples.



Grouped per Configuration

This example compares the results for grouped per configuration data.


Reference Case

MIL-HDBK-189C, Section 6.2.3.2, pg. 86, 2011.

For this example, the Crow-AMSAA (NHPP) model parameters will be calculated.


Data

The following table shows the data.

Configuration Number Number of Failures in Configuration Number of Trials in Configuration
1 5 14
2 3 19
3 4 15
4 4 20


Result

The book has the following results:

Beta = 0.780, Lambda = 0.595

Configuration i Reliability for Configuration i
1 0.667
2 0.766
3 0.794
4 0.810


Results in RGA

In RGA, the Crow-AMSAA (NHPP) model with the maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) method was used to calculate the results.

  • The model parameters are:
MIL-HDBK-189C 6.2.3.2 Example Results.png


Configuration i Reliability for Configuration i
1 0.6668
2 0.7662
3 0.7939
4 0.8096
  • The reliability vs. time plot:
MIL-HDBK-189C 6.2.3.2 Example Plot.png
Retrieved from "https://www.reliawiki.com/index.php?title=Grouped_Per_Configuration_Reference_Example&oldid=55949"