|
|
| Line 148: |
Line 148: |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| *The Cramer-von Mises goodness-of-fit test result: | | *The Cramér-von Mises goodness-of-fit test result: |
|
| |
|
| [[image:IEC 61164 Example 1 - Case 2_Stat Tests.png|center]] | | [[image:IEC 61164 Example 1 - Case 2_Stat Tests.png|center]] |
Revision as of 18:39, 13 June 2014
New format available! This reference is now available in a new format that offers faster page load, improved display for calculations and images and more targeted search.
As of January 2024, this Reliawiki page will not continue to be updated. Please update all links and bookmarks to the latest references at RGA examples and RGA reference examples.
|
Test-Fix-Test Data (Failure Terminated) Reference Example
|
This example compares the results for test-fix-test data (failure terminated).
Reference Case
International Standard IEC 61164 (Reliability Growth in Product Design and Test – Statistical Test and Estimation Methods), Example 1 – Case 2, pg. 30.
Data
The following table shows the data.
| 2
|
| 4
|
| 10
|
| 15
|
| 18
|
| 19
|
| 20
|
| 25
|
| 39
|
| 41
|
| 43
|
| 45
|
| 47
|
| 66
|
| 88
|
| 97
|
| 104
|
| 105
|
| 120
|
| 196
|
| 217
|
| 219
|
| 257
|
| 260
|
| 281
|
| 283
|
| 289
|
| 307
|
| 329
|
| 357
|
| 372
|
| 374
|
| 393
|
| 403
|
| 466
|
| 521
|
| 556
|
| 571
|
| 621
|
| 628
|
| 642
|
| 684
|
| 732
|
| 735
|
| 754
|
| 792
|
| 803
|
| 805
|
| 832
|
| 836
|
| 873
|
| 975
|
Termination Time = 975 hours
Result
The book has the following results:
- Beta(UnB) = 0.5594, Lambda = 1.1067
- CL = 0.9 (two-sided confidence bounds on DMTBF)
- CVM = 0.041, critical value = 0.173. Since CVM < critical value can fail to reject hypothesis that the model fits the data.
Results in RGA
In RGA, the Crow-AMSAA (NHPP) model with the maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) method was used to calculate the results.
- The model parameters are:
- The Cramér-von Mises goodness-of-fit test result:
- The instantaneous MTBF and its two-sided 90% confidence intervals are shown next. The confidence bounds in the QCP are calculated using Crow Bounds methodology.
