|
|
| Line 9: |
Line 9: |
|
| |
|
| {{Reference_Example_Heading2}} | | {{Reference_Example_Heading2}} |
| | |
| | The following table shows the data. |
| | |
| {| {{table|12%}} | | {| {{table|12%}} |
| |- | | |- |
| Line 62: |
Line 65: |
|
| |
|
| {{Reference_Example_Heading3}} | | {{Reference_Example_Heading3}} |
| | |
| | The book has the following results: |
|
| |
|
| Beta = 0.413, Lambda = 1.769 | | Beta = 0.413, Lambda = 1.769 |
Revision as of 15:47, 13 June 2014
RGA_Reference_Examples_Banner.png
This example compares the results for test-fix-test data (time terminated).
Reference Case
Crow, L.H., Confidence Interval Procedures for the Weibull Process with Applications to Reliability Growth, U.S. Army Material Systems Analysis Activity, 1981.
Data
The following table shows the data.
| 0.2
|
| 4.2
|
| 4.5
|
| 5
|
| 5.4
|
| 6.1
|
| 7.9
|
| 14.8
|
| 19.2
|
| 48.6
|
| 85.8
|
| 108.9
|
| 127.2
|
| 129.8
|
| 150.1
|
| 159.7
|
| 227.4
|
| 244.7
|
| 262.7
|
| 315.3
|
| 329.6
|
| 404.3
|
| 486.2
|
Termination Time = 500 hours
Result
The book has the following results:
Beta = 0.413, Lambda = 1.769
DMTBF = 52.7
Confidence Bounds on DMTBF (CL = 80%) = (35.6, 82.9)
Results in RGA
- [math]\displaystyle{ \begin{align}
\widehat{\beta }=&\frac{N}{{N\ln T^{*}}-\sum_{i=1}^{N}T_{i}}\\
\\
=&\frac{23}{{23\cdot \ln \left ( 500 \right )}-87.2106}\\
\\
=&0.4127
\end{align}\,\! }[/math]
- [math]\displaystyle{ \begin{align}
\widehat{\lambda }=&\frac{N}{T^{*\beta }}\\
\\
=&\frac{23}{500^{0.4127}}\\
\\
=&1.7691
\end{align}\,\! }[/math]
