Template:Example: Lognormal General Example Complete Data RRX: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
[math]\displaystyle{ \text{Table }\text{ - Times-to-Failure Data} }[/math]
[math]\displaystyle{ \begin{matrix}
\text{Data Point Index} & \text{Time-to-Failure, hr} \\
\text{1} & \text{62}\text{.5} \\
\text{2} & \text{91}\text{.9} \\
\text{3} & \text{100}\text{.3} \\
\text{4} & \text{117}\text{.4} \\
\text{5} & \text{141}\text{.1} \\
\text{6} & \text{146}\text{.8} \\
\text{7} & \text{172}\text{.7} \\
\text{8} & \text{192}\text{.5} \\
\text{9} & \text{201}\text{.6} \\
\text{10} & \text{235}\text{.8} \\
\text{11} & \text{249}\text{.2} \\
\text{12} & \text{297}\text{.5} \\
\text{13} & \text{318}\text{.3} \\
\text{14} & \text{410}\text{.6} \\
\text{15} & \text{550}\text{.5} \\
\end{matrix} }[/math]
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
From [[Appendix: Weibull References|Kececioglu [20, p. 347]]]. Fifteen identical units were tested to failure and following is a table of their times-to-failure: | From [[Appendix: Weibull References|Kececioglu [20, p. 347]]]. Fifteen identical units were tested to failure and following is a table of their times-to-failure: | ||
<center><math>\text{Table }\text{ - Times-to-Failure Data}</math></center> | <center><math>\text{Table }\text{ - Times-to-Failure Data}</math></center> | ||
Line 24: | Line 23: | ||
\text{15} & \text{550}\text{.5} \\ | \text{15} & \text{550}\text{.5} \\ | ||
\end{matrix}</math></center> | \end{matrix}</math></center> | ||
'''Solution''' | '''Solution''' | ||
Line 34: | Line 32: | ||
{{\widehat{\sigma' }}}=0.62048. \\ | {{\widehat{\sigma' }}}=0.62048. \\ | ||
\end{matrix}</math> | \end{matrix}</math> | ||
Weibull++ computed parameters for rank regression on X are: | Weibull++ computed parameters for rank regression on X are: | ||
::<math>\begin{matrix} | ::<math>\begin{matrix} | ||
Line 43: | Line 39: | ||
{{\widehat{\sigma'}}}=0.6283. \\ | {{\widehat{\sigma'}}}=0.6283. \\ | ||
\end{matrix}</math> | \end{matrix}</math> | ||
The small differences are due to the precision errors when fitting a line manually, whereas in Weibull++ the line was fitted mathematically. | The small differences are due to the precision errors when fitting a line manually, whereas in Weibull++ the line was fitted mathematically. |
Revision as of 05:08, 8 August 2012
Lognormal Distribution General Example Complete Data RRX
From Kececioglu [20, p. 347]. Fifteen identical units were tested to failure and following is a table of their times-to-failure:
Solution
Published results (using probability plotting):
- [math]\displaystyle{ \begin{matrix} {{\widehat{\mu }}^{\prime }}=5.22575 \\ {{\widehat{\sigma' }}}=0.62048. \\ \end{matrix} }[/math]
Weibull++ computed parameters for rank regression on X are:
- [math]\displaystyle{ \begin{matrix} {{\widehat{\mu }}^{\prime }}=5.2303 \\ {{\widehat{\sigma'}}}=0.6283. \\ \end{matrix} }[/math]
The small differences are due to the precision errors when fitting a line manually, whereas in Weibull++ the line was fitted mathematically.