Arrhenius Example: Difference between revisions

From ReliaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 31: Line 31:
[[Image:ALTA6.10.gif|thumb|center|400px|Comparison of the confidence bounds for different use stress levels.]]
[[Image:ALTA6.10.gif|thumb|center|400px|Comparison of the confidence bounds for different use stress levels.]]


[Category ALTA Examples]
[[Category:ALTA Examples]]

Revision as of 10:26, 24 April 2012

ALTA-Examples-banner.png


Consider the following times-to-failure data at three different stress levels.



6stresstimefailed.gif



The data set was analyzed jointly and with a complete MLE solution over the entire data set, using ReliaSoft's ALTA. The analysis yields:


[math]\displaystyle{ \widehat{\beta }=4.2915822 }[/math]



[math]\displaystyle{ \widehat{B}=1861.6186657 }[/math]



[math]\displaystyle{ \widehat{C}=58.9848692 }[/math]



Once the parameters of the model are estimated, extrapolation and other life measures can be directly obtained using the appropriate equations. Using the MLE method, confidence bounds for all estimates can be obtained. Note that in the next figure the more distant the accelerated stress from the operating stress, the greater the uncertainty of the extrapolation. The degree of uncertainty is reflected in the confidence bounds. (General theory and calculations for confidence intervals are presented in Appendix A. Specific calculations for confidence bounds on the Arrhenius model are presented in Appendix 6.A).

Comparison of the confidence bounds for different use stress levels.