Weibull++ Warranty Folio Data Nevada: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[Image:Articleblue.png]] | | [[Image:Articleblue.png]] | ||
| [http://reliawiki.com/index.php/ | | [http://www.reliawiki.com/index.php/Nevada_Chart_Articles related article(s)...] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[Image:Bulbblue.png]] | | [[Image:Bulbblue.png]] | ||
| [http://reliawiki.com/index.php/Template:Example:Nevada_Chart_Format use example(s)...] | | [http://reliawiki.com/index.php/Template:Example:Nevada_Chart_Format use example(s)...] | ||
|} | |} | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
Revision as of 17:30, 8 March 2012
 |
| Warranty Folio Data Nevada |
|
The Nevada Format allows the user to convert shipping and warranty return data into the standard reliability data form of failures and suspensions so that it can easily be analyzed with traditional life data analysis methods. For each time period in which a number of products are shipped, there will be a certain number of returns or failures in subsequent time periods, while the rest of the population that was shipped will continue to operate in the following time periods. For example, if 500 units are shipped in May, and 10 of those units are warranty returns in June, that is equivalent to 10 failures at a time of one month. The other 450 units will go on to operate and possibly fail in months that follow. At the end of the analysis period, all of the units that were shipped and have not failed in the time since shipment are considered to be suspensions. This process is repeated for each shipment and the results tabulated for each particular failure and suspension time prior to reliability analysis. |
Learn more from...
|
the help files... |
|
the theory textbook... |
|
related article(s)... |
|
use example(s)... |
