|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{InProgress}}{{Banner RGA Reference Examples}}__NOTOC__This example compares the results for test-fix-test data (failure terminated). | | {{Reference Example|RGA_Reference_Examples_Banner.png|RGA_Reference_Examples}} |
| | This example compares the results for test-fix-test data (failure terminated). |
| | | |
|
| |
|
| Line 134: |
Line 135: |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| {{Reference_Example_Heading4|Software=RGA}} | | {{Reference_Example_Heading4|RGA}} |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
Revision as of 20:19, 9 June 2014
RGA_Reference_Examples_Banner.png
This example compares the results for test-fix-test data (failure terminated).
Reference Case
International Standard IEC 61164 (Reliability Growth in Product Design and Test – Statistical Test and Estimation Methods), Example 1 – Case 2, pg. 30.
Data
| Termination Time = 975 hours
|
| 2
|
| 4
|
| 10
|
| 15
|
| 18
|
| 19
|
| 20
|
| 25
|
| 39
|
| 41
|
| 43
|
| 45
|
| 47
|
| 66
|
| 88
|
| 97
|
| 104
|
| 105
|
| 120
|
| 196
|
| 217
|
| 219
|
| 257
|
| 260
|
| 281
|
| 283
|
| 289
|
| 307
|
| 329
|
| 357
|
| 372
|
| 374
|
| 393
|
| 403
|
| 466
|
| 521
|
| 556
|
| 571
|
| 621
|
| 628
|
| 642
|
| 684
|
| 732
|
| 735
|
| 754
|
| 792
|
| 803
|
| 805
|
| 832
|
| 836
|
| 873
|
| 975
|
Result
Beta (UnB) = 0.5594, Lambda = 1.1067
CL = 0.9 (two-sided confidence bounds on DMTBF
DMTBFUpper = 46.7 hours
DMTBF = 33.5 hours
DMTBFLower = 24.3 hours
CVM = 0.041, critical value = 0.173. Since CVM < critical value can fail to reject hypothesis that the model fits the data.
Results in RGA
Confidence bounds in QCP are calculated using Crow Bounds methodology.
