Grouped per Configuration - Standard Gompertz Model: Difference between revisions

From ReliaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
Line 38: Line 38:
<li>The data is entered in cumulative format and the estimated standard Gompertz parameters are shown in the following figure.
<li>The data is entered in cumulative format and the estimated standard Gompertz parameters are shown in the following figure.


[[Image:rga7.6.png|center|400px|Entered data and the estimated Standard Gompertz parameters.]]
[[Image:rga7.6.png|center|600px|Entered data and the estimated Standard Gompertz parameters.]]
</li>
</li>
<li>The initial reliability at <math>T=0\,\!</math> is equal to:
<li>The initial reliability at <math>T=0\,\!</math> is equal to:
Line 50: Line 50:
<li>The reliability at the ninth stage can be calculated using the Quick Calculation Pad (QCP) as shown in the figure below.
<li>The reliability at the ninth stage can be calculated using the Quick Calculation Pad (QCP) as shown in the figure below.


[[Image:rga7.7.png|center|400px|Calculate the reliability at the end of the ninth stage with 90% confidence bounds.]]
[[Image:rga7.7.png|center|450px|Calculate the reliability at the end of the ninth stage with 90% confidence bounds.]]


The estimated reliability at the end of the ninth stage is equal to 91.92%. However, the lower limit at the 90% 1-sided confidence bound is equal to 82.15%. Therefore, the required goal of 85% reliability at a 90% confidence level has not been met.
The estimated reliability at the end of the ninth stage is equal to 91.92%. However, the lower limit at the 90% 1-sided confidence bound is equal to 82.15%. Therefore, the required goal of 85% reliability at a 90% confidence level has not been met.
</li>
</li>
</ol>
</ol>

Revision as of 18:58, 29 May 2014

RGA Examples Banner.png


New format available! This reference is now available in a new format that offers faster page load, improved display for calculations and images and more targeted search.

As of January 2024, this Reliawiki page will not continue to be updated. Please update all links and bookmarks to the latest references at RGA examples and RGA reference examples.




This example appears in the Reliability Growth and Repairable System Analysis Reference.


A new design is put through a reliability growth test. The requirement is that after the ninth stage the design will exhibit an 85% reliability with a 90% confidence level. Given the data in the following table, do the following:

  1. Estimate the parameters of the standard Gompertz model.
  2. What is the initial reliability at [math]\displaystyle{ T=0\,\! }[/math] ?
  3. Determine the reliability at the end of the ninth stage and check to see whether the goal has been met.
Grouped per Configuration Data
Stage Number of Units Number of Failures
1 10 5
2 8 3
3 9 3
4 9 2
5 10 2
6 10 1
7 10 1
8 10 1
9 10 1

Solution

  1. The data is entered in cumulative format and the estimated standard Gompertz parameters are shown in the following figure.
    Entered data and the estimated Standard Gompertz parameters.
  2. The initial reliability at [math]\displaystyle{ T=0\,\! }[/math] is equal to:
    [math]\displaystyle{ \begin{align} {{R}_{T=0}}= & a\cdot b \\ = & 0.9497\cdot 0.5249 \\ = & 0.4985 \end{align}\,\! }[/math]
  3. The reliability at the ninth stage can be calculated using the Quick Calculation Pad (QCP) as shown in the figure below.
    Calculate the reliability at the end of the ninth stage with 90% confidence bounds.

    The estimated reliability at the end of the ninth stage is equal to 91.92%. However, the lower limit at the 90% 1-sided confidence bound is equal to 82.15%. Therefore, the required goal of 85% reliability at a 90% confidence level has not been met.