Failure Times Crow-AMSAA Example: Difference between revisions
Chris Kahn (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<noinclude>{{Banner RGA Examples}} | <noinclude>{{Banner RGA Examples}} | ||
''This example appears in the [[Crow-AMSAA_(NHPP)|Reliability Growth and Repairable System Analysis Reference | ''This example appears in the [[Crow-AMSAA_(NHPP)|Reliability Growth and Repairable System Analysis Reference]]''. | ||
</noinclude> | </noinclude> | ||
Revision as of 00:13, 23 April 2014
New format available! This reference is now available in a new format that offers faster page load, improved display for calculations and images and more targeted search.
As of January 2024, this Reliawiki page will not continue to be updated. Please update all links and bookmarks to the latest references at RGA examples and RGA reference examples.
This example appears in the Reliability Growth and Repairable System Analysis Reference.
A prototype of a system was tested at the end of one of its design stages. The test was run for a total of 300 hours and 27 failures were observed. The table below shows the collected data set. The prototype has a design specification of an MTBF equal to 10 hours with a 90% confidence level at 300 hours. Do the following:
- Estimate the parameters of the Crow-AMSAA model using maximum likelihood estimation.
- Does the prototype meet the specified goal?
2.6 | 56.5 | 98.1 | 190.7 |
16.5 | 63.1 | 101.1 | 193 |
16.5 | 70.6 | 132 | 198.7 |
17 | 73 | 142.2 | 251.9 |
21.4 | 77.7 | 147.7 | 282.5 |
29.1 | 93.9 | 149 | 286.1 |
33.3 | 95.5 | 167.2 |
Solution
- The next figure shows the parameters estimated using RGA.
- The instantaneous MTBF with one-sided 90% confidence bounds can be calculated using the Quick Calculation Pad (QCP), as shown next. From the QCP, it is estimated that the lower limit on the MTBF at 300 hours with a 90% confidence level is equal to 10.8170 hours. Therefore, the prototype has met the specified goal.