Crow-AMSAA Model - Grouped Data Example: Difference between revisions
Kate Racaza (talk | contribs) (Created page with '<noinclude>{{Banner RGA Examples}} ''This example appears in the Reliability Growth and Repairable System Analysis Reference book''. </noinclude> Consider …') |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<noinclude>{{Banner RGA Examples}} | <noinclude>{{Banner RGA Examples}} | ||
''This example appears in the [[Crow-AMSAA (NHPP)|Reliability Growth and Repairable System Analysis Reference | ''This example appears in the [[Crow-AMSAA (NHPP)|Reliability Growth and Repairable System Analysis Reference]]''. | ||
</noinclude> | </noinclude> | ||
Revision as of 00:11, 23 April 2014
New format available! This reference is now available in a new format that offers faster page load, improved display for calculations and images and more targeted search.
As of January 2024, this Reliawiki page will not continue to be updated. Please update all links and bookmarks to the latest references at RGA examples and RGA reference examples.
This example appears in the Reliability Growth and Repairable System Analysis Reference.
Consider the grouped failure times data given in the following table. Solve for the Crow-AMSAA parameters using MLE.
Run Number | Cumulative Failures | End Time(hours) | [math]\displaystyle{ \ln{(T_i)}\,\! }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ \ln{(T_i)^2}\,\! }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ \ln{(\theta_i)}\,\! }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ \ln{(T_i)}\cdot\ln{(\theta_i)}\,\! }[/math] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 200 | 5.298 | 28.072 | 0.693 | 3.673 |
2 | 3 | 400 | 5.991 | 35.898 | 1.099 | 6.582 |
3 | 4 | 600 | 6.397 | 40.921 | 1.386 | 8.868 |
4 | 11 | 3000 | 8.006 | 64.102 | 2.398 | 19.198 |
Sum = | 25.693 | 168.992 | 5.576 | 38.321 |
Solution
Using RGA, the value of [math]\displaystyle{ \hat{\beta }\,\! }[/math], which must be solved numerically, is 0.6315. Using this value, the estimator of [math]\displaystyle{ \lambda \,\! }[/math] is:
- [math]\displaystyle{ \begin{align} \hat{\lambda } = & \frac{11}{3,{{000}^{0.6315}}} \\ = & 0.0701 \end{align}\,\! }[/math]
Therefore, the intensity function becomes:
- [math]\displaystyle{ \hat{\rho }(T)=0.0701\cdot 0.6315\cdot {{T}^{-0.3685}}\,\! }[/math]