Hypothesis Tests: Difference between revisions
Lisa Hacker (talk | contribs) |
Kate Racaza (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Template:RGA_BOOK_SUB|Appendix B|Hypothesis Tests}} | {{Template:RGA_BOOK_SUB|Appendix B|Hypothesis Tests}} | ||
=Common Beta Hypothesis Test= | =Common Beta Hypothesis Test= | ||
The | The common beta hypothesis (CBH) test is applicable to the following data types: multiple systems-concurrent operating times, repairable and fleet. As shown by Crow [[RGA_References|[17]]], suppose that <math>K\,\!</math> number of systems are under test. Each system has an intensity function given by: | ||
::<math>{{u}_{q}}(t)={{\lambda }_{q}}{{\beta }_{q}}{{t}^{{{\beta }_{q}}-1}}\,\!</math> | ::<math>{{u}_{q}}(t)={{\lambda }_{q}}{{\beta }_{q}}{{t}^{{{\beta }_{q}}-1}}\,\!</math> | ||
where <math>q=1,\ldots ,K\,\!</math>. You can compare the intensity functions of each of the systems by comparing the <math>{{\beta }_{q}}\,\!</math> of each system. When conducting an analysis of data consisting of multiple systems, you expect that each of the systems performed in a similar manner. In particular, you would expect the interarrival rate of the failures across the systems to be fairly consistent. Therefore, the CBH | |||
where <math>q=1,\ldots ,K\,\!</math>. You can compare the intensity functions of each of the systems by comparing the <math>{{\beta }_{q}}\,\!</math> of each system. When conducting an analysis of data consisting of multiple systems, you expect that each of the systems performed in a similar manner. In particular, you would expect the interarrival rate of the failures across the systems to be fairly consistent. Therefore, the CBH test evaluates the hypothesis, <math>{{H}_{o}}\,\!</math>, such that <math>{{\beta }_{1}}={{\beta }_{2}}=\ldots ={{\beta }_{K}}\,\!</math>. Let <math>{{\tilde{\beta }}_{q}}\,\!</math> denote the conditional maximum likelihood estimate of <math>{{\beta }_{q}}\,\!</math>, which is given by: | |||
::<math>{{\tilde{\beta }}_{q}}=\frac{\underset{q=1}{\overset{K}{\mathop{\sum }}}\,{{M}_{q}}}{\underset{q=1}{\overset{K}{\mathop{\sum }}}\,\underset{i=1}{\overset{{{M}_{q}}}{\mathop{\sum }}}\,\ln \left( \tfrac{{{T}_{q}}}{{{X}_{iq}}} \right)}\,\!</math> | ::<math>{{\tilde{\beta }}_{q}}=\frac{\underset{q=1}{\overset{K}{\mathop{\sum }}}\,{{M}_{q}}}{\underset{q=1}{\overset{K}{\mathop{\sum }}}\,\underset{i=1}{\overset{{{M}_{q}}}{\mathop{\sum }}}\,\ln \left( \tfrac{{{T}_{q}}}{{{X}_{iq}}} \right)}\,\!</math> | ||
| Line 14: | Line 15: | ||
:*<math>{{M}_{q}}={{N}_{q}}\,\!</math> if data on the <math>{{q}^{th}}\,\!</math> system is time terminated or <math>{{M}_{q}}=({{N}_{q}}-1)\,\!</math> if data on the <math>{{q}^{th}}\,\!</math> system is failure terminated ( <math>{{N}_{q}}\,\!</math> is the number of failures on the <math>{{q}^{th}}\,\!</math> system). | :*<math>{{M}_{q}}={{N}_{q}}\,\!</math> if data on the <math>{{q}^{th}}\,\!</math> system is time terminated or <math>{{M}_{q}}=({{N}_{q}}-1)\,\!</math> if data on the <math>{{q}^{th}}\,\!</math> system is failure terminated ( <math>{{N}_{q}}\,\!</math> is the number of failures on the <math>{{q}^{th}}\,\!</math> system). | ||
:*<math>{{X}_{iq}}\,\!</math> is the <math>{{i}^{th}}\,\!</math> time-to-failure on the <math>{{q}^{th}}\,\!</math> system. | :*<math>{{X}_{iq}}\,\!</math> is the <math>{{i}^{th}}\,\!</math> time-to-failure on the <math>{{q}^{th}}\,\!</math> system. | ||
Then for each system, assume that: | Then for each system, assume that: | ||
| Line 19: | Line 21: | ||
::<math>\chi _{q}^{2}=\frac{2{{M}_{q}}{{\beta }_{q}}}{{{{\tilde{\beta }}}_{q}}}\,\!</math> | ::<math>\chi _{q}^{2}=\frac{2{{M}_{q}}{{\beta }_{q}}}{{{{\tilde{\beta }}}_{q}}}\,\!</math> | ||
are conditionally distributed as independent | |||
are conditionally distributed as independent chi-squared random variables with <math>2{{M}_{q}}\,\!</math> degrees of freedom. When <math>K=2\,\!</math>, you can test the null hypothesis, <math>{{H}_{o}}\,\!</math>, using the following statistic: | |||
::<math>F=\frac{\tfrac{\chi _{1}^{2}}{2{{M}_{1}}}}{\tfrac{\chi _{2}^{2}}{2{{M}_{2}}}}\,\!</math> | ::<math>F=\frac{\tfrac{\chi _{1}^{2}}{2{{M}_{1}}}}{\tfrac{\chi _{2}^{2}}{2{{M}_{2}}}}\,\!</math> | ||
If <math>{{H}_{o}}\,\!</math> is true, then <math>F\,\!</math> equals <math>\tfrac{{{{\tilde{\beta }}}_{2}}}{{{{\tilde{\beta }}}_{1}}}\,\!</math> and conditionally has an F-distribution with <math>(2{{M}_{1}},2{{M}_{2}})\,\!</math> degrees of freedom. The critical value, <math>F\,\!</math>, can then be determined by referring to the | |||
If <math>{{H}_{o}}\,\!</math> is true, then <math>F\,\!</math> equals <math>\tfrac{{{{\tilde{\beta }}}_{2}}}{{{{\tilde{\beta }}}_{1}}}\,\!</math> and conditionally has an F-distribution with <math>(2{{M}_{1}},2{{M}_{2}})\,\!</math> degrees of freedom. The critical value, <math>F\,\!</math>, can then be determined by referring to the chi-squared tables. Now, if <math>K\ge 2\,\!</math>, then the likelihood ratio procedure can be used to test the hypothesis <math>{{\beta }_{1}}={{\beta }_{2}}=\ldots ={{\beta }_{K}}\,\!</math>, as discussed in Crow [[RGA_References|[17]]]. Consider the following statistic: | |||
::<math>L=\underset{q=1}{\overset{K}{\mathop \sum }}\,{{M}_{q}}\ln ({{\tilde{\beta }}_{q}})-M\ln ({{\beta }^{*}})\,\!</math> | ::<math>L=\underset{q=1}{\overset{K}{\mathop \sum }}\,{{M}_{q}}\ln ({{\tilde{\beta }}_{q}})-M\ln ({{\beta }^{*}})\,\!</math> | ||
| Line 31: | Line 35: | ||
:*<math>M=\underset{q=1}{\overset{K}{\mathop{\sum }}}\,{{M}_{q}}\,\!</math> | :*<math>M=\underset{q=1}{\overset{K}{\mathop{\sum }}}\,{{M}_{q}}\,\!</math> | ||
:*<math>{{\beta }^{*}}=\tfrac{M}{\underset{q=1}{\overset{K}{\mathop{\sum }}}\,\tfrac{{{M}_{q}}}{{{{\tilde{\beta }}}_{q}}}}\,\!</math> | :*<math>{{\beta }^{*}}=\tfrac{M}{\underset{q=1}{\overset{K}{\mathop{\sum }}}\,\tfrac{{{M}_{q}}}{{{{\tilde{\beta }}}_{q}}}}\,\!</math> | ||
Also, let: | Also, let: | ||
::<math>a=1+\frac{1}{6(K-1)}\left[ \underset{q=1}{\overset{K}{\mathop \sum }}\,\frac{1}{{{M}_{q}}}-\frac{1}{M} \right]\,\!</math> | ::<math>a=1+\frac{1}{6(K-1)}\left[ \underset{q=1}{\overset{K}{\mathop \sum }}\,\frac{1}{{{M}_{q}}}-\frac{1}{M} \right]\,\!</math> | ||
Calculate the statistic <math>D\,\!</math>, such that: | Calculate the statistic <math>D\,\!</math>, such that: | ||
| Line 40: | Line 46: | ||
::<math>D=\frac{2L}{a}\,\!</math> | ::<math>D=\frac{2L}{a}\,\!</math> | ||
The statistic <math>D\,\!</math> is approximately distributed as a | |||
The statistic <math>D\,\!</math> is approximately distributed as a chi-squared random variable with <math>(K-1)\,\!</math> degrees of freedom. Then after calculating <math>D\,\!</math>, refer to the chi-squared tables with <math>(K-1)\,\!</math> degrees of freedom to determine the critical points. <math>{{H}_{o}}\,\!</math> is true if the statistic <math>D\,\!</math> falls between the critical points. | |||
==Common Beta Hypothesis Example== | ==Common Beta Hypothesis Example== | ||
| Line 86: | Line 93: | ||
Given that the intensity function for the <math>{{q}^{th}}\,\!</math> system is <math>{{u}_{q}}(t)={{\lambda }_{q}}{{\beta }_{q}}{{t}^{{{\beta }_{q}}-1}}\,\!</math>, test the hypothesis that <math>{{\beta }_{1}}={{\beta }_{2}}\,\!</math> while assuming a significance level equal to 0.05. Calculate <math>{{\tilde{\beta }}_{1}}\,\!</math> and <math>{{\tilde{\beta }}_{2}}\,\!</math> | Given that the intensity function for the <math>{{q}^{th}}\,\!</math> system is <math>{{u}_{q}}(t)={{\lambda }_{q}}{{\beta }_{q}}{{t}^{{{\beta }_{q}}-1}}\,\!</math>, test the hypothesis that <math>{{\beta }_{1}}={{\beta }_{2}}\,\!</math> while assuming a significance level equal to 0.05. Calculate the maximum likelihood estimates of <math>{{\tilde{\beta }}_{1}}\,\!</math> and <math>{{\tilde{\beta }}_{2}}\,\!</math>. Therefore: | ||
::<math>\begin{align} | ::<math>\begin{align} | ||
| Line 93: | Line 100: | ||
\end{align}\,\!</math> | \end{align}\,\!</math> | ||
Then <math>\tfrac{{{{\tilde{\beta }}}_{2}}}{{{{\tilde{\beta }}}_{1}}}=1.2408\,\!</math>. | |||
Then <math>\tfrac{{{{\tilde{\beta }}}_{2}}}{{{{\tilde{\beta }}}_{1}}}=1.2408\,\!</math>. Calculate the statistic <math>F\,\!</math> with a significance level of 0.05. | |||
::<math>\begin{align} | ::<math>\begin{align} | ||
F=2.0980 | F=2.0980 | ||
\end{align}\,\!</math> | \end{align}\,\!</math> | ||
Since <math>1.2408<2.0980\,\!</math> we fail to reject the null hypothesis that <math>{{\beta }_{1}}={{\beta }_{2}}\,\!</math> at the 5% significance level. | Since <math>1.2408<2.0980\,\!</math> we fail to reject the null hypothesis that <math>{{\beta }_{1}}={{\beta }_{2}}\,\!</math> at the 5% significance level. | ||
Now suppose | |||
Now suppose that we test the hypothesis that <math>{{\beta }_{1}}={{\beta }_{2}}={{\beta }_{3}}\,\!</math>. Calculate the statistic <math>D\,\!</math>. | |||
::<math>\begin{align} | ::<math>\begin{align} | ||
| Line 106: | Line 116: | ||
\end{align}\,\!</math> | \end{align}\,\!</math> | ||
Using the | |||
Using the chi-square tables with <math>K-1=2\,\!</math> degrees of freedom, the critical values at the 2.5 and 97.5 percentiles are 0.1026 and 5.9915, respectively. Since <math>0.1026<D<5.9915\,\!</math>, we fail to reject the null hypothesis that <math>{{\beta }_{1}}={{\beta }_{2}}={{\beta }_{3}}\,\!</math> at the 5% significance level. | |||
=Laplace Trend Test= | =Laplace Trend Test= | ||
Revision as of 17:50, 4 October 2012
Common Beta Hypothesis Test
The common beta hypothesis (CBH) test is applicable to the following data types: multiple systems-concurrent operating times, repairable and fleet. As shown by Crow [17], suppose that [math]\displaystyle{ K\,\! }[/math] number of systems are under test. Each system has an intensity function given by:
- [math]\displaystyle{ {{u}_{q}}(t)={{\lambda }_{q}}{{\beta }_{q}}{{t}^{{{\beta }_{q}}-1}}\,\! }[/math]
where [math]\displaystyle{ q=1,\ldots ,K\,\! }[/math]. You can compare the intensity functions of each of the systems by comparing the [math]\displaystyle{ {{\beta }_{q}}\,\! }[/math] of each system. When conducting an analysis of data consisting of multiple systems, you expect that each of the systems performed in a similar manner. In particular, you would expect the interarrival rate of the failures across the systems to be fairly consistent. Therefore, the CBH test evaluates the hypothesis, [math]\displaystyle{ {{H}_{o}}\,\! }[/math], such that [math]\displaystyle{ {{\beta }_{1}}={{\beta }_{2}}=\ldots ={{\beta }_{K}}\,\! }[/math]. Let [math]\displaystyle{ {{\tilde{\beta }}_{q}}\,\! }[/math] denote the conditional maximum likelihood estimate of [math]\displaystyle{ {{\beta }_{q}}\,\! }[/math], which is given by:
- [math]\displaystyle{ {{\tilde{\beta }}_{q}}=\frac{\underset{q=1}{\overset{K}{\mathop{\sum }}}\,{{M}_{q}}}{\underset{q=1}{\overset{K}{\mathop{\sum }}}\,\underset{i=1}{\overset{{{M}_{q}}}{\mathop{\sum }}}\,\ln \left( \tfrac{{{T}_{q}}}{{{X}_{iq}}} \right)}\,\! }[/math]
where:
- [math]\displaystyle{ K=1.\,\! }[/math]
- [math]\displaystyle{ {{M}_{q}}={{N}_{q}}\,\! }[/math] if data on the [math]\displaystyle{ {{q}^{th}}\,\! }[/math] system is time terminated or [math]\displaystyle{ {{M}_{q}}=({{N}_{q}}-1)\,\! }[/math] if data on the [math]\displaystyle{ {{q}^{th}}\,\! }[/math] system is failure terminated ( [math]\displaystyle{ {{N}_{q}}\,\! }[/math] is the number of failures on the [math]\displaystyle{ {{q}^{th}}\,\! }[/math] system).
- [math]\displaystyle{ {{X}_{iq}}\,\! }[/math] is the [math]\displaystyle{ {{i}^{th}}\,\! }[/math] time-to-failure on the [math]\displaystyle{ {{q}^{th}}\,\! }[/math] system.
Then for each system, assume that:
- [math]\displaystyle{ \chi _{q}^{2}=\frac{2{{M}_{q}}{{\beta }_{q}}}{{{{\tilde{\beta }}}_{q}}}\,\! }[/math]
are conditionally distributed as independent chi-squared random variables with [math]\displaystyle{ 2{{M}_{q}}\,\! }[/math] degrees of freedom. When [math]\displaystyle{ K=2\,\! }[/math], you can test the null hypothesis, [math]\displaystyle{ {{H}_{o}}\,\! }[/math], using the following statistic:
- [math]\displaystyle{ F=\frac{\tfrac{\chi _{1}^{2}}{2{{M}_{1}}}}{\tfrac{\chi _{2}^{2}}{2{{M}_{2}}}}\,\! }[/math]
If [math]\displaystyle{ {{H}_{o}}\,\! }[/math] is true, then [math]\displaystyle{ F\,\! }[/math] equals [math]\displaystyle{ \tfrac{{{{\tilde{\beta }}}_{2}}}{{{{\tilde{\beta }}}_{1}}}\,\! }[/math] and conditionally has an F-distribution with [math]\displaystyle{ (2{{M}_{1}},2{{M}_{2}})\,\! }[/math] degrees of freedom. The critical value, [math]\displaystyle{ F\,\! }[/math], can then be determined by referring to the chi-squared tables. Now, if [math]\displaystyle{ K\ge 2\,\! }[/math], then the likelihood ratio procedure can be used to test the hypothesis [math]\displaystyle{ {{\beta }_{1}}={{\beta }_{2}}=\ldots ={{\beta }_{K}}\,\! }[/math], as discussed in Crow [17]. Consider the following statistic:
- [math]\displaystyle{ L=\underset{q=1}{\overset{K}{\mathop \sum }}\,{{M}_{q}}\ln ({{\tilde{\beta }}_{q}})-M\ln ({{\beta }^{*}})\,\! }[/math]
where:
- [math]\displaystyle{ M=\underset{q=1}{\overset{K}{\mathop{\sum }}}\,{{M}_{q}}\,\! }[/math]
- [math]\displaystyle{ {{\beta }^{*}}=\tfrac{M}{\underset{q=1}{\overset{K}{\mathop{\sum }}}\,\tfrac{{{M}_{q}}}{{{{\tilde{\beta }}}_{q}}}}\,\! }[/math]
Also, let:
- [math]\displaystyle{ a=1+\frac{1}{6(K-1)}\left[ \underset{q=1}{\overset{K}{\mathop \sum }}\,\frac{1}{{{M}_{q}}}-\frac{1}{M} \right]\,\! }[/math]
Calculate the statistic [math]\displaystyle{ D\,\! }[/math], such that:
- [math]\displaystyle{ D=\frac{2L}{a}\,\! }[/math]
The statistic [math]\displaystyle{ D\,\! }[/math] is approximately distributed as a chi-squared random variable with [math]\displaystyle{ (K-1)\,\! }[/math] degrees of freedom. Then after calculating [math]\displaystyle{ D\,\! }[/math], refer to the chi-squared tables with [math]\displaystyle{ (K-1)\,\! }[/math] degrees of freedom to determine the critical points. [math]\displaystyle{ {{H}_{o}}\,\! }[/math] is true if the statistic [math]\displaystyle{ D\,\! }[/math] falls between the critical points.
Common Beta Hypothesis Example
Consider the data in the following table.
| Repairable system data | |||
| System 1 | System 2 | System 3 | |
| Start | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| End | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 |
| Failures | 1.2 | 1.4 | 0.3 |
| 55.6 | 35 | 32.6 | |
| 72.7 | 46.8 | 33.4 | |
| 111.9 | 65.9 | 241.7 | |
| 121.9 | 181.1 | 396.2 | |
| 303.6 | 712.6 | 444.4 | |
| 326.9 | 1005.7 | 480.8 | |
| 1568.4 | 1029.9 | 588.9 | |
| 1913.5 | 1675.7 | 1043.9 | |
| 1787.5 | 1136.1 | ||
| 1867 | 1288.1 | ||
| 1408.1 | |||
| 1439.4 | |||
| 1604.8 | |||
Given that the intensity function for the [math]\displaystyle{ {{q}^{th}}\,\! }[/math] system is [math]\displaystyle{ {{u}_{q}}(t)={{\lambda }_{q}}{{\beta }_{q}}{{t}^{{{\beta }_{q}}-1}}\,\! }[/math], test the hypothesis that [math]\displaystyle{ {{\beta }_{1}}={{\beta }_{2}}\,\! }[/math] while assuming a significance level equal to 0.05. Calculate the maximum likelihood estimates of [math]\displaystyle{ {{\tilde{\beta }}_{1}}\,\! }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ {{\tilde{\beta }}_{2}}\,\! }[/math]. Therefore:
- [math]\displaystyle{ \begin{align} & {{{\tilde{\beta }}}_{1}}= & 0.3753 \\ & {{{\tilde{\beta }}}_{2}}= & 0.4657 \end{align}\,\! }[/math]
Then [math]\displaystyle{ \tfrac{{{{\tilde{\beta }}}_{2}}}{{{{\tilde{\beta }}}_{1}}}=1.2408\,\! }[/math]. Calculate the statistic [math]\displaystyle{ F\,\! }[/math] with a significance level of 0.05.
- [math]\displaystyle{ \begin{align} F=2.0980 \end{align}\,\! }[/math]
Since [math]\displaystyle{ 1.2408\lt 2.0980\,\! }[/math] we fail to reject the null hypothesis that [math]\displaystyle{ {{\beta }_{1}}={{\beta }_{2}}\,\! }[/math] at the 5% significance level.
Now suppose that we test the hypothesis that [math]\displaystyle{ {{\beta }_{1}}={{\beta }_{2}}={{\beta }_{3}}\,\! }[/math]. Calculate the statistic [math]\displaystyle{ D\,\! }[/math].
- [math]\displaystyle{ \begin{align} D=0.5260 \end{align}\,\! }[/math]
Using the chi-square tables with [math]\displaystyle{ K-1=2\,\! }[/math] degrees of freedom, the critical values at the 2.5 and 97.5 percentiles are 0.1026 and 5.9915, respectively. Since [math]\displaystyle{ 0.1026\lt D\lt 5.9915\,\! }[/math], we fail to reject the null hypothesis that [math]\displaystyle{ {{\beta }_{1}}={{\beta }_{2}}={{\beta }_{3}}\,\! }[/math] at the 5% significance level.
Laplace Trend Test
The Laplace Trend Test tests the hypothesis that a trend does not exist within the data. The Laplace Trend test is applicable to the following data types: Multiple Systems-Concurrent Operating Times, Repairable and Fleet. The Laplace Trend Test can determine whether the system is deteriorating, improving, or if there is no trend at all. Calculate the test statistic, [math]\displaystyle{ U\,\! }[/math], using the following equation:
- [math]\displaystyle{ U=\frac{\tfrac{\underset{i=1}{\overset{N}{\mathop{\sum }}}\,{{X}_{i}}}{N}-\tfrac{T}{2}}{T\sqrt{\tfrac{1}{12N}}}\,\! }[/math]
where:
- [math]\displaystyle{ T\,\! }[/math] = total operating time (termination time)
- [math]\displaystyle{ {{X}_{i}}\,\! }[/math] = age of the system at the [math]\displaystyle{ {{i}^{th}}\,\! }[/math] successive failure
- [math]\displaystyle{ N\,\! }[/math] = total number of failures
The test statistic [math]\displaystyle{ U\,\! }[/math] is approximately a standard normal random variable. The critical value is read from the Standard Normal tables with a given significance level, [math]\displaystyle{ \alpha \,\! }[/math].
Laplace Trend Test Example
Consider once again the data given in the table above. Check for a trend within System 1 assuming a significance level of 0.10. Calculate the test statistic [math]\displaystyle{ U\,\! }[/math] for System 1 using Eqn. (Utatistic).
- [math]\displaystyle{ \begin{align} U=-2.6121 \end{align}\,\! }[/math]
From the Standard Normal tables with a significance level of 0.10, the critical value is equal to 1.645. If [math]\displaystyle{ -1.645\lt U\lt 1.645\,\! }[/math] then we would fail to reject the hypothesis of no trend. However, since [math]\displaystyle{ U\lt -1.645\,\! }[/math] then an improving trend exists within System 1.
If [math]\displaystyle{ U\gt 1.645\,\! }[/math] then a deteriorating trend would exist.
Critical Values for Cramér-von Mises Test
[PER LISA -- NEED TO ASK SME IF THERE'S A WAY TO MAKE THIS CHAPTER MORE BALANCED. CAN WE GIVE A GENERAL DISCUSSION AND AN EXAMPLE HERE, SO IT'S CONSISTENT WITH THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE FOR THE OTHER TWO TYPES OF TESTS? OR MAYBE THIS SECTION DOESN'T BELONG IN AN APPENDIX CALLED "HYPOTHESIS TESTS"?]
The following table displays the critical values for the Cramér-von Mises goodness-of-fit test given the sample size, [math]\displaystyle{ M\,\! }[/math], and the significance level, [math]\displaystyle{ \alpha \,\! }[/math].
| Critical values for Cramér-von Mises test | |||||
| [math]\displaystyle{ \alpha \,\! }[/math] | |||||
| [math]\displaystyle{ M\,\! }[/math] | 0.20 | 0.15 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.01 |
| 2 | 0.138 | 0.149 | 0.162 | 0.175 | 0.186 |
| 3 | 0.121 | 0.135 | 0.154 | 0.184 | 0.23 |
| 4 | 0.121 | 0.134 | 0.155 | 0.191 | 0.28 |
| 5 | 0.121 | 0.137 | 0.160 | 0.199 | 0.30 |
| 6 | 0.123 | 0.139 | 0.162 | 0.204 | 0.31 |
| 7 | 0.124 | 0.140 | 0.165 | 0.208 | 0.32 |
| 8 | 0.124 | 0.141 | 0.165 | 0.210 | 0.32 |
| 9 | 0.125 | 0.142 | 0.167 | 0.212 | 0.32 |
| 10 | 0.125 | 0.142 | 0.167 | 0.212 | 0.32 |
| 11 | 0.126 | 0.143 | 0.169 | 0.214 | 0.32 |
| 12 | 0.126 | 0.144 | 0.169 | 0.214 | 0.32 |
| 13 | 0.126 | 0.144 | 0.169 | 0.214 | 0.33 |
| 14 | 0.126 | 0.144 | 0.169 | 0.214 | 0.33 |
| 15 | 0.126 | 0.144 | 0.169 | 0.215 | 0.33 |
| 16 | 0.127 | 0.145 | 0.171 | 0.216 | 0.33 |
| 17 | 0.127 | 0.145 | 0.171 | 0.217 | 0.33 |
| 18 | 0.127 | 0.146 | 0.171 | 0.217 | 0.33 |
| 19 | 0.127 | 0.146 | 0.171 | 0.217 | 0.33 |
| 20 | 0.128 | 0.146 | 0.172 | 0.217 | 0.33 |
| 30 | 0.128 | 0.146 | 0.172 | 0.218 | 0.33 |
| 60 | 0.128 | 0.147 | 0.173 | 0.220 | 0.33 |
| 100 | 0.129 | 0.147 | 0.173 | 0.220 | 0.34 |
For application of the Cramér-von Mises critical values, refer to the Crow-AMSAA (NHPP) chapter and <PER LISA: NEED SME TO DETERMINE WHAT THIS WAS SUPPOSED TO REFER TO -- SECTION DOES NOT EXIST IN V7 BOOK > Section 10.1.6.1.