Warranty Analysis Usage Format Example: Difference between revisions
Kate Racaza (talk | contribs) (updated example) |
Kate Racaza (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<noinclude>{{Banner Weibull Examples}} | <noinclude>{{Banner Weibull Examples}} | ||
''This example appears in the [[Warranty_Data_Analysis#Warranty_Analysis_.28Usage_Format.29|Life Data Analysis Reference book]]''. | ''This example appears in the [[Warranty_Data_Analysis#Warranty_Analysis_.28Usage_Format.29|Life Data Analysis Reference book]]''. | ||
'''Warranty Analysis Usage Format Example''' | |||
</noinclude>'''Warranty Analysis Usage Format Example''' | |||
Suppose that an automotive manufacturer collects the warranty returns and sales data given in the following tables. Convert this information to life data and analyze it using the lognormal distribution. | Suppose that an automotive manufacturer collects the warranty returns and sales data given in the following tables. Convert this information to life data and analyze it using the lognormal distribution. |
Revision as of 05:05, 26 July 2012
New format available! This reference is now available in a new format that offers faster page load, improved display for calculations and images and more targeted search.
As of January 2024, this Reliawiki page will not continue to be updated. Please update all links and bookmarks to the latest references at Weibull examples and Weibull reference examples.
This example appears in the Life Data Analysis Reference book.
Warranty Analysis Usage Format Example
Suppose that an automotive manufacturer collects the warranty returns and sales data given in the following tables. Convert this information to life data and analyze it using the lognormal distribution.
Quantity In-Service | Date In-Service |
9 | Dec-09 |
13 | Jan-10 |
15 | Feb-10 |
20 | Mar-10 |
15 | Apr-10 |
25 | May-10 |
19 | Jun-10 |
16 | Jul-10 |
20 | Aug-10 |
19 | Sep-10 |
25 | Oct-10 |
30 | Nov-10 |
Quantity Returned | Usage at Return Date | Return Date |
1 | 9072 | Dec-09 |
1 | 9743 | Jan-10 |
1 | 6857 | Feb-10 |
1 | 7651 | Mar-10 |
1 | 5083 | May-10 |
1 | 5990 | May-10 |
1 | 7432 | May-10 |
1 | 8739 | May-10 |
1 | 3158 | Jun-10 |
1 | 1136 | Jul-10 |
1 | 4646 | Aug-10 |
1 | 3965 | Sep-10 |
1 | 3117 | Oct-10 |
1 | 3250 | Nov-10 |
Solution
Create a warranty analysis folio and select the usage format. Enter the data from the tables in the Sales, Returns and Future Sales sheets. The warranty data were collected until 12/1/2010; therefore, on the control panel, set the End of Observation Period to that date. Set the failure distribution to Lognormal, as shown next.
In this example, the manufacturer has been documenting the mileage accumulation per year for this type of product across the customer base in comparable regions for many years. The yearly usage has been determined to follow a lognormal distribution with [math]\displaystyle{ {{\mu }_{T\prime }}=9.38 }[/math] , [math]\displaystyle{ {{\sigma }_{T\prime }}=0.085 }[/math]. The Interval Width is defined to be 1000 miles. Enter the information about the usage distribution on the Usage page of the control panel, as shown next.
Click Calculate to analyze the data set. The parameters are estimated to be:
- [math]\displaystyle{ \begin{align} & {{\mu }_{T\prime }}= & 10.528098 \\ & {{\sigma }_{T\prime }}= & 1.135150 \end{align} }[/math]
The reliability plot (with mileage being the random variable driving reliability), along with the 90% confidence bounds on reliability, is shown next.