Test-Fix-Test Data Reference Example: Difference between revisions

From ReliaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Reference Example|{{Banner RGA Reference_Examples}}}}
{{Reference Example|{{Banner RGA Reference_Examples}}|Test-Fix-Test Data}}
This example compares the results for test-fix-test data (time terminated).  
This example validates the results for test-fix-test data (time terminated) in RGA.  




Line 6: Line 6:


Crow, L.H., ''Confidence Interval Procedures for the Weibull Process with Applications to Reliability Growth'', U.S. Army Material Systems Analysis Activity, 1981.
Crow, L.H., ''Confidence Interval Procedures for the Weibull Process with Applications to Reliability Growth'', U.S. Army Material Systems Analysis Activity, 1981.
For this example, the following will be calculated:
*Parameters of the Crow-AMSAA (NHPP) model
*Demonstrated MTBF (DMTBF)
*80% two-sided confidence bounds on the DMTBF




Line 80: Line 85:


::<math>\begin{align}
::<math>\begin{align}
\hat{\beta }=&\frac{N}{N\ln T^{*}-\underset{i=1}{\overset{N}{\mathop \sum }}T_{i}}\\
\hat{\beta }=&\frac{N}{N\ln T^{*}-\underset{i=1}{\overset{N}{\mathop \sum }}\,T_{i}}\\
\\
\\
=&\frac{23}{{23\cdot \ln \left ( 500 \right )}-87.2106}\\
=&\frac{23}{{23\cdot \ln \left ( 500 \right )}-87.2106}\\

Latest revision as of 18:26, 28 September 2015

RGA Reference Examples Banner.png


New format available! This reference is now available in a new format that offers faster page load, improved display for calculations and images and more targeted search.

As of January 2024, this Reliawiki page will not continue to be updated. Please update all links and bookmarks to the latest references at RGA examples and RGA reference examples.




Test-Fix-Test Data

This example validates the results for test-fix-test data (time terminated) in RGA.


Reference Case

Crow, L.H., Confidence Interval Procedures for the Weibull Process with Applications to Reliability Growth, U.S. Army Material Systems Analysis Activity, 1981.

For this example, the following will be calculated:

  • Parameters of the Crow-AMSAA (NHPP) model
  • Demonstrated MTBF (DMTBF)
  • 80% two-sided confidence bounds on the DMTBF


Data

The following table shows the data.

0.2
4.2
4.5
5
5.4
6.1
7.9
14.8
19.2
48.6
85.8
108.9
127.2
129.8
150.1
159.7
227.4
244.7
262.7
315.3
329.6
404.3
486.2
Termination Time = 500 hours


Result

The book has the following results:

  • Beta = 0.413, Lambda = 1.769
  • DMTBF = 52.7
  • Confidence Bounds on DMTBF (CL = 80%) = (35.6, 82.9)


Results in RGA

In RGA, the Crow-AMSAA (NHPP) model with the maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) method was used to calculate the results. The following equations are used to calculate [math]\displaystyle{ \beta\,\! }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ \lambda\,\! }[/math].

[math]\displaystyle{ \begin{align} \hat{\beta }=&\frac{N}{N\ln T^{*}-\underset{i=1}{\overset{N}{\mathop \sum }}\,T_{i}}\\ \\ =&\frac{23}{{23\cdot \ln \left ( 500 \right )}-87.2106}\\ \\ =&0.4127 \end{align}\,\! }[/math]


[math]\displaystyle{ \begin{align} \hat{\lambda }=&\frac{N}{T^{*\beta }}\\ \\ =&\frac{23}{500^{0.4127}}\\ \\ =&1.7691 \end{align}\,\! }[/math]


  • The model parameters are:
CB for Weibull Results.png


  • The instantaneous MTBF and its two-sided 80% confidence bounds are:
CB for Weibull QPC.png