Test-Fix-Test Data (Failure Terminated) Reference Example: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
Kate Racaza (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(21 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Reference Example| | {{Reference Example|{{Banner RGA Reference_Examples}}}} | ||
This example | This example validates the results for test-fix-test data (failure terminated) in RGA. | ||
{{Reference_Example_Heading1}} | {{Reference_Example_Heading1}} | ||
International Standard IEC 61164 (Reliability Growth in Product Design and Test – Statistical Test and Estimation Methods), Example | International Standard IEC 61164 (Reliability Growth in Product Design and Test – Statistical Test and Estimation Methods), Example 2 – Case 1, pg. 30. | ||
{{Reference_Example_Heading2}} | {{Reference_Example_Heading2}} | ||
The following table shows the data. | |||
{| {{table|12%}} | |||
|- | |||
| 2 | |||
|- | |||
| 4 | |||
|- | |||
| 10 | |||
|- | |||
| 15 | |||
|- | |||
| 18 | |||
|- | |||
| 19 | |||
|- | |||
| 20 | |||
|- | |||
| 25 | |||
|- | |||
| 39 | |||
|- | |||
| 41 | |||
|- | |||
| 43 | |||
|- | |||
| 45 | |||
|- | |||
| 47 | |||
|- | |||
| 66 | |||
|- | |||
| 88 | |||
|- | |||
| 97 | |||
|- | |||
| 104 | |||
|- | |||
| 105 | |||
|- | |||
| 120 | |||
|- | |||
| 196 | |||
|- | |||
| 217 | |||
|- | |||
| 219 | |||
|- | |||
| 257 | |||
|- | |||
| 260 | |||
|- | |||
| 281 | |||
|- | |||
| 283 | |||
|- | |||
| 289 | |||
|- | |||
| 307 | |||
|- | |||
| 329 | |||
|- | |||
| 357 | |||
|- | |||
| 372 | |||
|- | |||
| 374 | |||
|- | |||
| 393 | |||
|- | |||
| 403 | |||
|- | |||
| 466 | |||
|- | |||
| 521 | |||
|- | |||
| 556 | |||
|- | |||
| 571 | |||
|- | |||
| 621 | |||
|- | |||
| 628 | |||
|- | |||
| 642 | |||
|- | |||
| 684 | |||
|- | |||
| 732 | |||
|- | |||
| 735 | |||
|- | |||
| 754 | |||
|- | |||
| 792 | |||
|- | |||
| 803 | |||
|- | |||
| 805 | |||
|- | |||
| 832 | |||
|- | |||
| 836 | |||
|- | |||
| 873 | |||
|- | |||
| 975 | |||
|- | |||
|+'''Termination Time = 975 hours''' | |||
|} | |||
{{Reference_Example_Heading3}} | {{Reference_Example_Heading3}} | ||
{{Reference_Example_Heading4| | The book has the following results: | ||
*Beta(UnB) = 0.5594, Lambda = 1.1067 | |||
*CL = 0.9 (two-sided confidence bounds on DMTBF) | |||
*DMTBF<sub>Upper</sub> = 46.7 hours | |||
*DMTBF = 33.5 hours | |||
*DMTBF<sub>Lower</sub> = 24.3 hours | |||
*CVM = 0.041, critical value = 0.173. Since CVM < critical value can fail to reject hypothesis that the model fits the data. | |||
{{Reference_Example_Heading4|RGA}} | |||
In RGA, the Crow-AMSAA (NHPP) model with the maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) method was used to calculate the results. | |||
*The model parameters are: | |||
[[image:IEC 61164 Example 1 - Case 2_Results.png|center]] | |||
*The Cramér-von Mises goodness-of-fit test result: | |||
[[image:IEC 61164 Example 1 - Case 2_Stat Tests.png|center]] | |||
*The instantaneous MTBF and its two-sided 90% confidence intervals are shown next. The confidence bounds in the QCP are calculated using Crow Bounds methodology. | |||
[[image:IEC 61164 Example 1 - Case 2_QPC.png|center]] |
Latest revision as of 18:27, 28 September 2015
New format available! This reference is now available in a new format that offers faster page load, improved display for calculations and images and more targeted search.
As of January 2024, this Reliawiki page will not continue to be updated. Please update all links and bookmarks to the latest references at RGA examples and RGA reference examples.