Crow-AMSAA Model - Grouped Data Example: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Lisa Hacker (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<noinclude>{{Banner RGA Examples}} | <noinclude>{{Banner RGA Examples}} | ||
''This example appears in the [ | ''This example appears in the [https://help.reliasoft.com/reference/reliability_growth_and_repairable_system_analysis Reliability growth reference]''. | ||
</noinclude> | </noinclude> | ||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
{|border="1" align="center" style="border-collapse: collapse;" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="5" | {|border="1" align="center" style="border-collapse: collapse;" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="5" | ||
|+'''Grouped | |+'''Grouped Failure Times Data''' | ||
!Run Number | !Run Number | ||
!Cumulative Failures | !Cumulative Failures |
Latest revision as of 21:20, 18 September 2023
New format available! This reference is now available in a new format that offers faster page load, improved display for calculations and images and more targeted search.
As of January 2024, this Reliawiki page will not continue to be updated. Please update all links and bookmarks to the latest references at RGA examples and RGA reference examples.
This example appears in the Reliability growth reference.
Consider the grouped failure times data given in the following table. Solve for the Crow-AMSAA parameters using MLE.
Run Number | Cumulative Failures | End Time(hours) | [math]\displaystyle{ \ln{(T_i)}\,\! }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ \ln{(T_i)^2}\,\! }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ \ln{(\theta_i)}\,\! }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ \ln{(T_i)}\cdot\ln{(\theta_i)}\,\! }[/math] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 200 | 5.298 | 28.072 | 0.693 | 3.673 |
2 | 3 | 400 | 5.991 | 35.898 | 1.099 | 6.582 |
3 | 4 | 600 | 6.397 | 40.921 | 1.386 | 8.868 |
4 | 11 | 3000 | 8.006 | 64.102 | 2.398 | 19.198 |
Sum = | 25.693 | 168.992 | 5.576 | 38.321 |
Solution
Using RGA, the value of [math]\displaystyle{ \hat{\beta }\,\! }[/math], which must be solved numerically, is 0.6315. Using this value, the estimator of [math]\displaystyle{ \lambda \,\! }[/math] is:
- [math]\displaystyle{ \begin{align} \hat{\lambda } = & \frac{11}{3,{{000}^{0.6315}}} \\ = & 0.0701 \end{align}\,\! }[/math]
Therefore, the intensity function becomes:
- [math]\displaystyle{ \hat{\rho }(T)=0.0701\cdot 0.6315\cdot {{T}^{-0.3685}}\,\! }[/math]