Warranty Analysis Usage Format Example: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Kate Racaza (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Quantity Returned''' | | align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Quantity Returned''' | ||
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Usage at Return Date''' | | align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Usage at Return Date''' | ||
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|''' | | align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Date In-Service''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 1||9072||Dec-09 | | 1||9072||Dec-09 |
Revision as of 17:06, 29 October 2015
New format available! This reference is now available in a new format that offers faster page load, improved display for calculations and images and more targeted search.
As of January 2024, this Reliawiki page will not continue to be updated. Please update all links and bookmarks to the latest references at Weibull examples and Weibull reference examples.
This example appears in the Life Data Analysis Reference book.
Warranty Analysis Usage Format Example
Suppose that an automotive manufacturer collects the warranty returns and sales data given in the following tables. Convert this information to life data and analyze it using the lognormal distribution.
Quantity In-Service | Date In-Service |
9 | Dec-09 |
13 | Jan-10 |
15 | Feb-10 |
20 | Mar-10 |
15 | Apr-10 |
25 | May-10 |
19 | Jun-10 |
16 | Jul-10 |
20 | Aug-10 |
19 | Sep-10 |
25 | Oct-10 |
30 | Nov-10 |
Quantity Returned | Usage at Return Date | Date In-Service |
1 | 9072 | Dec-09 |
1 | 9743 | Jan-10 |
1 | 6857 | Feb-10 |
1 | 7651 | Mar-10 |
1 | 5083 | May-10 |
1 | 5990 | May-10 |
1 | 7432 | May-10 |
1 | 8739 | May-10 |
1 | 3158 | Jun-10 |
1 | 1136 | Jul-10 |
1 | 4646 | Aug-10 |
1 | 3965 | Sep-10 |
1 | 3117 | Oct-10 |
1 | 3250 | Nov-10 |
Solution
Create a warranty analysis folio and select the usage format. Enter the data from the tables in the Sales, Returns and Future Sales sheets. The warranty data were collected until 12/1/2010; therefore, on the control panel, set the End of Observation Period to that date. Set the failure distribution to Lognormal, as shown next.
In this example, the manufacturer has been documenting the mileage accumulation per year for this type of product across the customer base in comparable regions for many years. The yearly usage has been determined to follow a lognormal distribution with [math]\displaystyle{ {{\mu }_{T\prime }}=9.38\,\! }[/math], [math]\displaystyle{ {{\sigma }_{T\prime }}=0.085\,\! }[/math]. The Interval Width is defined to be 1,000 miles. Enter the information about the usage distribution on the Suspensions page of the control panel, as shown next.
Click Calculate to analyze the data set. The parameters are estimated to be:
- [math]\displaystyle{ \begin{align} & {{\mu }_{T\prime }}= & 10.528098 \\ & {{\sigma }_{T\prime }}= & 1.135150 \end{align}\,\! }[/math]
The reliability plot (with mileage being the random variable driving reliability), along with the 90% confidence bounds on reliability, is shown next.
In this example, the life data set contains 14 failures and 212 suspensions spread according to the defined usage distribution. You can display this data in a standard folio by choosing Warranty > Transfer Life Data > Transfer Life Data to New Folio. The failures and suspensions data set, as presented in the standard folio, is shown next (showing only the first 30 rows of data).