Grouped Per Configuration Reference Example: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
Kate Racaza (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{Reference Example|{{Banner RGA Reference_Examples}}|Grouped per Configuration}} | ||
This example | This example validates the results for grouped per configuration data in RGA. | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
MIL-HDBK-189C, Section 6.2.3.2, pg. 86, 2011. | MIL-HDBK-189C, Section 6.2.3.2, pg. 86, 2011. | ||
For this example, the Crow-AMSAA (NHPP) model parameters will be calculated. | |||
{{Reference_Example_Heading2}} | {{Reference_Example_Heading2}} | ||
The following table shows the data. | |||
{| {{table}} | {| {{table}} | ||
| Line 27: | Line 31: | ||
{{Reference_Example_Heading3}} | {{Reference_Example_Heading3}} | ||
The book has the following results: | |||
Beta = 0.780, Lambda = 0.595 | Beta = 0.780, Lambda = 0.595 | ||
| Line 45: | Line 51: | ||
{{Reference_Example_Heading4| | {{Reference_Example_Heading4|RGA}} | ||
In RGA, the Crow-AMSAA (NHPP) model with the maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) method was used to calculate the results. | |||
*The model parameters are: | |||
[[image:MIL-HDBK-189C 6.2.3.2 Example_Results.png|center]] | [[image:MIL-HDBK-189C 6.2.3.2 Example_Results.png|center]] | ||
| Line 65: | Line 74: | ||
|} | |} | ||
*The reliability vs. time plot: | |||
[[image:MIL-HDBK-189C 6.2.3.2 Example_Plot.png|center|550px]] | [[image:MIL-HDBK-189C 6.2.3.2 Example_Plot.png|center|550px]] | ||
Latest revision as of 18:26, 28 September 2015
 |
New format available! This reference is now available in a new format that offers faster page load, improved display for calculations and images and more targeted search.
As of January 2024, this Reliawiki page will not continue to be updated. Please update all links and bookmarks to the latest references at RGA examples and RGA reference examples.
