Template:WebNotes/RGACrow AMSAA Developmental: Difference between revisions
Chris Kahn (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{Template: WebNotesRGABanner}} | {{Template: WebNotesRGABanner}} | ||
|{{Font|Crow-AMSAA Model for Developmental Data|11|tahoma|bold|gray}} | |{{Font|Crow-AMSAA Model for Developmental Data|11|tahoma|bold|gray}} | ||
In "Reliability Analysis for Complex, Repairable Systems" (1974), Dr. Larry H. Crow noted that the Duane model could be stochastically represented as a Weibull process, allowing for statistical procedures to be used in the application of this model in reliability growth. This statistical extension became what is known as the Crow-AMSAA (NHPP) model. This method was first employed by the U.S. Army Materiel Systems Analysis Activity (AMSAA). It is frequently used on systems when usage is measured on a continuous scale. It can also be applied for high reliability, a large number of trials and one-shot items. Test programs are generally conducted on a phase-by-phase basis. The Crow-AMSAA model is designed for tracking the reliability within a test phase | In "Reliability Analysis for Complex, Repairable Systems" (1974), Dr. Larry H. Crow noted that the Duane model could be stochastically represented as a Weibull process, allowing for statistical procedures to be used in the application of this model in reliability growth. This statistical extension became what is known as the Crow-AMSAA (NHPP) model. This method was first employed by the U.S. Army Materiel Systems Analysis Activity (AMSAA). It is frequently used on systems when usage is measured on a continuous scale. It can also be applied for high reliability, a large number of trials and one-shot items. Test programs are generally conducted on a phase-by-phase basis. The Crow-AMSAA model is designed for tracking the reliability within a test phase, rather than across test phases. | ||
|} | |} | ||
{{Font|Learn more from...|11|tahoma|bold|gray}} | {{Font|Learn more from...|11|tahoma|bold|gray}} | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[Image:Helpblue.png]] | | [[Image:Helpblue.png]] | ||
| [http://help.synthesisplatform.net/rga9/traditional_reliability_growth_analysis.htm | | | [http://help.synthesisplatform.net/rga9/index.htm#traditional_reliability_growth_analysis.htm V9 Help] or [http://help.synthesisplatform.net/rga10/index.htm#traditional_reliability_growth_analysis.htm V10 Help] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[Image:Book blue.png]] | | [[Image:Book blue.png]] | ||
Latest revision as of 23:07, 23 April 2015
 |
| Crow-AMSAA Model for Developmental Data
In "Reliability Analysis for Complex, Repairable Systems" (1974), Dr. Larry H. Crow noted that the Duane model could be stochastically represented as a Weibull process, allowing for statistical procedures to be used in the application of this model in reliability growth. This statistical extension became what is known as the Crow-AMSAA (NHPP) model. This method was first employed by the U.S. Army Materiel Systems Analysis Activity (AMSAA). It is frequently used on systems when usage is measured on a continuous scale. It can also be applied for high reliability, a large number of trials and one-shot items. Test programs are generally conducted on a phase-by-phase basis. The Crow-AMSAA model is designed for tracking the reliability within a test phase, rather than across test phases. |
Learn more from...
|
V9 Help or V10 Help |
|
the theory textbook... |
|
related article(s)... |
|
application example(s)... |
