Three Level Compromise Test Plan for One Stress: Difference between revisions

From ReliaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with '{{Reference Example|ALTA_Reference_Examples_Banner.png|ALTA_Reference_Examples}} This example compares the statistically optimum test plan result for one stress from the ALTA Te…')
 
No edit summary
Line 37: Line 37:
* 84 units will be tested at temperature of 120°C (393.15°K)
* 84 units will be tested at temperature of 120°C (393.15°K)


The estimated standard error for the B10 life at 50°C from this test plan is <math>Ase\left [log \left(\hat{t}_{0.1}(50) \right) \right]\,\!</math> .  
The estimated standard error for the B10 life at 50°C from this test plan is <math>Ase\left [log \left(\hat{t}_{0.1}(50) \right) \right] = 0.4375\,\!</math> .  




{{Reference_Example_Heading4|ALTA}}
{{Reference_Example_Heading4|ALTA}}
The planning information is entered in ALTA, as shown below.
[[Image: Compromise plan one stress.png|center]]
The resulting three level best compromise test plan in ALTA is shown below.
[[Image: Compromise plan test plan.png|center|700 px]]
The test plan shows that:
* The low stress level (row 29) should be 364.56 °K (91.41°C) and about 159 units should be tested at this temperature.
* The middle stress level (row 30) should be 378.32 °K (105.17°C) and about 60 units should be tested at this temperature.
* The high stress level (row 31) should be 393.15 °K (120°C) and about 81 units should be tested at this temperature.
The estimated standard deviation of the log B10 life at 50°C can be obtained by:
::<math>Ase\left[log \left(\hat{t}_{0.1}(50) \right) \right] = \frac{Ase\hat{t}_{0.1}(50)}{\hat{t}_{0.1}(50)} = \frac{1181.94}{2990.09} = 0.3953\,\!</math>
The above results are different from the results in the book. In the following discussion, a simulation study is conducted to check the result obtained from ALTA.
'''Using ALTA SimuMatic to Evaluate the Test Plan'''
We will use the SimuMatic utility to evaluate the test plan. The following picture shows the settings used the Main tab of SimuMatic (with <math>\alpha_{1} = \beta_{1} \times 11605\,\!</math>):
[[Image: Compromise plan simumatic.png|center|600px]]
The rest of the SimuMatic settings are as follows:
* Stress tab:
::Use level = '''323.15''', Transformation = '''Reciprocal'''
* Censoring tab:
::Right censoring after time '''183'''.
* Settings tab
::Seed = '''10''', Precision = '''4''', Number of data sets = '''1000'''
* Reliabilities and Times
::Reliability value = '''0.9'''
The simulation results are shown next.
[[Image: Compromise plan simumatic2.png|center|600px]]
We take the nature log of the B10 life (the last column) and calculate its standard deviation. The calculated standard deviation is 0.4062. This is very close to the analytical solution from the ALTA test plan tool, where the standard deviation is 0.3953.
This standard deviation is smaller than the standard deviation given by the test plan in the book. Therefore, the test plan generated in ALTA is better than the test plan given in the book in terms of minimizing the estimation variance of the B10 life.

Revision as of 17:46, 11 June 2014

ALTA_Reference_Examples_Banner.png

ALTA_Reference_Examples

This example compares the statistically optimum test plan result for one stress from the ALTA Test Plan tool.

Reference Case

The data set is from Example 20.5 on page 542 in the book Statistical Methods for Reliability Data by Dr. Meeker and Dr. Escobar, John Wiley & Sons, 1998.


Data

A Weibull distribution with Arrhenius relationship is used. The Arrhenius relationship uses the following formula:

[math]\displaystyle{ ln(\eta) = \beta_{0} + \beta_{1} \times \frac{11605}{T}\,\! }[/math]


The planning values of the model parameters used in the test plan are [math]\displaystyle{ \beta\,\! }[/math] = 1.667,   [math]\displaystyle{ \beta_{0}\,\! }[/math] = -16.7333 and [math]\displaystyle{ \beta_{1}\,\! }[/math] = 0.7265. These planning values were obtained based on the following assumptions: 0.1% of the units will fail in 6 months (183 hours) at 50°C, and 90% would fail in 6 months at 120°C. This information is given in Example 20.2 on page 535.

The use temperature is 50°C (323.15°K) and the highest temperature used in the test is 120°C (393.15 °K).

A total of 300 units are available for testing. Three temperature levels can be used and 20% of the units will be tested at the middle temperature level. The objective of the test plan is to:

  • Determine the three temperature levels used in the test.
  • Determine the number of test units at the high and the low temperature level.

Tests will be conducted using the created test plan. The failure data from the test is then used to estimate the model parameters and the reliability model is used to predict the B10 life at 50°C and its variance.

We need to find a test plan with three temperature levels that will minimize the estimation variance for the B10 life at 50°C.


Result

The three level compromise test plan is:

  • 156 units will be tested at temperature of 78°C (351.15°K)
  • 60 units will be tested at temperature of 98°C (371.15°K)
  • 84 units will be tested at temperature of 120°C (393.15°K)

The estimated standard error for the B10 life at 50°C from this test plan is [math]\displaystyle{ Ase\left [log \left(\hat{t}_{0.1}(50) \right) \right] = 0.4375\,\! }[/math] .


Results in ALTA

The planning information is entered in ALTA, as shown below.

Compromise plan one stress.png


The resulting three level best compromise test plan in ALTA is shown below.


Compromise plan test plan.png


The test plan shows that:

  • The low stress level (row 29) should be 364.56 °K (91.41°C) and about 159 units should be tested at this temperature.
  • The middle stress level (row 30) should be 378.32 °K (105.17°C) and about 60 units should be tested at this temperature.
  • The high stress level (row 31) should be 393.15 °K (120°C) and about 81 units should be tested at this temperature.


The estimated standard deviation of the log B10 life at 50°C can be obtained by:

[math]\displaystyle{ Ase\left[log \left(\hat{t}_{0.1}(50) \right) \right] = \frac{Ase\hat{t}_{0.1}(50)}{\hat{t}_{0.1}(50)} = \frac{1181.94}{2990.09} = 0.3953\,\! }[/math]


The above results are different from the results in the book. In the following discussion, a simulation study is conducted to check the result obtained from ALTA.


Using ALTA SimuMatic to Evaluate the Test Plan

We will use the SimuMatic utility to evaluate the test plan. The following picture shows the settings used the Main tab of SimuMatic (with [math]\displaystyle{ \alpha_{1} = \beta_{1} \times 11605\,\! }[/math]):

Compromise plan simumatic.png


The rest of the SimuMatic settings are as follows:

  • Stress tab:
Use level = 323.15, Transformation = Reciprocal
  • Censoring tab:
Right censoring after time 183.
  • Settings tab
Seed = 10, Precision = 4, Number of data sets = 1000
  • Reliabilities and Times
Reliability value = 0.9


The simulation results are shown next.

Compromise plan simumatic2.png


We take the nature log of the B10 life (the last column) and calculate its standard deviation. The calculated standard deviation is 0.4062. This is very close to the analytical solution from the ALTA test plan tool, where the standard deviation is 0.3953.

This standard deviation is smaller than the standard deviation given by the test plan in the book. Therefore, the test plan generated in ALTA is better than the test plan given in the book in terms of minimizing the estimation variance of the B10 life.

Retrieved from "https://www.reliawiki.com/index.php?title=Three_Level_Compromise_Test_Plan_for_One_Stress&oldid=55579"