Grouped Per Configuration Reference Example: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{InProgress}}{{Banner RGA Reference Examples}}__NOTOC__Sample content | {{InProgress}}{{Banner RGA Reference Examples}}__NOTOC__Sample content | ||
This example compares the results for grouped per configuration data. | This example compares the results for grouped per configuration data. | ||
{{Reference_Example_Heading1}} | {{Reference_Example_Heading1}} | ||
| Line 23: | Line 24: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 17:25, 9 June 2014
 |
New format available! This reference is now available in a new format that offers faster page load, improved display for calculations and images and more targeted search.
As of January 2024, this Reliawiki page will not continue to be updated. Please update all links and bookmarks to the latest references at RGA examples and RGA reference examples.
Sample content
This example compares the results for grouped per configuration data.
Reference Case
MIL-HDBK-189C, Section 6.2.3.2, pg. 86, 2011.
Data
| Configuration Number | Number of Failures in Configuration | Number of Trials in Configuration |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | 14 |
| 2 | 3 | 19 |
| 3 | 4 | 15 |
| 4 | 4 | 20 |
Result
Beta = 0.780, Lambda = 0.595
| Configuration i | Reliability for Configuration i |
|---|---|
| 1 | 0.667 |
| 2 | 0.766 |
| 3 | 0.794 |
| 4 | 0.810 |
Results in Weibull++
| Configuration i | Reliability for Configuration i |
|---|---|
| 1 | 0.6668 |
| 2 | 0.7662 |
| 3 | 0.7939 |
| 4 | 0.8096 |
