Sequential Data - Standard Gompertz Model: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Kate Racaza (talk | contribs) (Created page with '<noinclude>{{Banner RGA Examples}} ''This example appears in the Reliability Growth and Repairable System Analysis Reference book''. </noinclude> Calculate t…') |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<noinclude>{{Banner RGA Examples}} | <noinclude>{{Banner RGA Examples}} | ||
''This example appears in the [[Gompertz_Models|Reliability Growth and Repairable System Analysis Reference | ''This example appears in the [[Gompertz_Models|Reliability Growth and Repairable System Analysis Reference]]''. | ||
</noinclude> | </noinclude> | ||
| Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
Using RGA, the parameter estimates are shown in the following figure. | Using RGA, the parameter estimates are shown in the following figure. | ||
[[Image:rga7.4.png|center| | [[Image:rga7.4.png|center|600px]] | ||
Revision as of 19:33, 29 May 2014
 |
New format available! This reference is now available in a new format that offers faster page load, improved display for calculations and images and more targeted search.
As of January 2024, this Reliawiki page will not continue to be updated. Please update all links and bookmarks to the latest references at RGA examples and RGA reference examples.
This example appears in the Reliability Growth and Repairable System Analysis Reference.
Calculate the parameters of the Gompertz model using the sequential data in the following table.
| Run Number | Result | Successes | Observed Reliability(%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | F | 0 | |
| 2 | F | 0 | |
| 3 | F | 0 | |
| 4 | S | 1 | 25.00 |
| 5 | F | 1 | 20.00 |
| 6 | F | 1 | 16.67 |
| 7 | S | 2 | 28.57 |
| 8 | S | 3 | 37.50 |
| 9 | S | 4 | 44.44 |
| 10 | S | 5 | 50.00 |
| 11 | S | 6 | 54.55 |
| 12 | S | 7 | 58.33 |
| 13 | S | 8 | 61.54 |
| 14 | S | 9 | 64.29 |
| 15 | S | 10 | 66.67 |
| 16 | S | 11 | 68.75 |
| 17 | F | 11 | 64.71 |
| 18 | S | 12 | 66.67 |
| 19 | F | 12 | 63.16 |
| 20 | S | 13 | 65.00 |
| 21 | S | 14 | 66.67 |
| 22 | S | 15 | 68.18 |
Solution
Using RGA, the parameter estimates are shown in the following figure.
