Weibull++ Diagram: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
One typical application for this tool is for performing complex failure modes analysis. As explained in the Competing Failure Modes (CFM) Analysis topic, the CFM analysis method that is built-in to the Weibull++ standard folio assumes a series reliability model and uses only one type of distribution to analyze all the modes. If the situation is more complex, an RBD analysis method must be used instead. | One typical application for this tool is for performing complex failure modes analysis. As explained in the Competing Failure Modes (CFM) Analysis topic, the CFM analysis method that is built-in to the Weibull++ standard folio assumes a series reliability model and uses only one type of distribution to analyze all the modes. If the situation is more complex, an RBD analysis method must be used instead. | ||
|} | |} | ||
{{Font|Learn more from...|11|tahoma|bold|gray}} | {{Font|Learn more from...|11|tahoma|bold|gray}} | ||
{| border="0" align="left" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="3" | {| border="0" align="left" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="3" | ||
Revision as of 20:34, 17 March 2012
 |
|
RBD Diagrams For convenience, a simplified version of BlockSim’s analytical RBD tool is also directly integrated within the Weibull++/ALTA interface. One typical application for this tool is for performing complex failure modes analysis. As explained in the Competing Failure Modes (CFM) Analysis topic, the CFM analysis method that is built-in to the Weibull++ standard folio assumes a series reliability model and uses only one type of distribution to analyze all the modes. If the situation is more complex, an RBD analysis method must be used instead. |
Learn more from...
|
the help files... |
|
the theory textbook... |
|
related article(s)... |
|
use example(s)... |