Template:Example: 3P Weibull Distribution: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
The following figure shows the results. Note that since the original data set was concave down, 17.26 was subtracted from all the times-to-failure and replotted, resulting in a straight line, thus <span class="texhtml">γ = 17.26</span>. (We used Weibull++ to get the results. To perform this by hand, one would attempt different values of <span class="texhtml">γ,</span> using a trial and error methodology, until an acceptable straight line is found. When performed manually, you do not expect decimal accuracy.) | The following figure shows the results. Note that since the original data set was concave down, 17.26 was subtracted from all the times-to-failure and replotted, resulting in a straight line, thus <span class="texhtml">γ = 17.26</span>. (We used Weibull++ to get the results. To perform this by hand, one would attempt different values of <span class="texhtml">γ,</span> using a trial and error methodology, until an acceptable straight line is found. When performed manually, you do not expect decimal accuracy.) | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
[[Image: | [[Image:WB.8 gamma data.png|center|400px|]] |
Revision as of 16:44, 15 March 2012
Three-parameter Weibull distribution example
Six identical units are reliability tested under the same stresses and conditions. All units are tested to failure and the following times-to-failure are recorded: 48, 66, 85, 107, 125 and 152 hours. Find the parameters of the three-parameter Weibull distribution using probability plotting.
Solution
The following figure shows the results. Note that since the original data set was concave down, 17.26 was subtracted from all the times-to-failure and replotted, resulting in a straight line, thus γ = 17.26. (We used Weibull++ to get the results. To perform this by hand, one would attempt different values of γ, using a trial and error methodology, until an acceptable straight line is found. When performed manually, you do not expect decimal accuracy.)