Reliability Importance - Revision history

Lisa Hacker at 20:59, 18 September 2023

2023-09-18T20:59:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:59, 18 September 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<noinclude>{{Banner BlockSim Articles}}{{Navigation box}}		<noinclude>{{Banner BlockSim Articles}}{{Navigation box}}
	''This article also appears in the [~~[Reliability_Importance_and_Optimized_Reliability_Allocation_(Analytical)#Component_Reliability_Importance\|~~System ~~Analysis Reference~~]~~] book~~.''		''This article also appears in the [https://help.reliasoft.com/reference/system_analysis System analysis reference].''
	</noinclude>		</noinclude>
	===Static Reliability Importance===		===Static Reliability Importance===

Richard House: /* Time-Dependent Reliability Importance */

2016-01-04T22:18:37Z

Time-Dependent Reliability Importance

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:18, 4 January 2016
Line 49:		Line 49:


	[[Image:6_5.png\|center\|~~777px~~\|Reliability Importance vs. time plot.\|link=]]		[[Image:6_5.png\|center\|700px\|Reliability Importance vs. time plot.\|link=]]

	===Example===		===Example===

Richard House: /* Time-Dependent Reliability Importance */

2016-01-04T22:14:34Z

Time-Dependent Reliability Importance

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:14, 4 January 2016
Line 43:		Line 43:
	In turn, this can be viewed as either a static plot (at a given time) or as a time-varying plot, as illustrated in the next figures. Specifically, the next three plots present the analysis for three components configured reliability-wise in series following a Weibull distribution with <math>\beta =3\,\!</math> and <math>{{\eta }_{1}}=1,000,\,\!</math> <math>{{\eta }_{2}}=2,000\,\!</math> and <math>{{\eta }_{3}}=3,000\,\!</math>. The first shows a bar chart of <math>{{I}_{{{R}_{i}}}}\,\!</math> while the second shows the <math>{{I}_{{{R}_{i}}}}\,\!</math> in BlockSim's tableau chart format. In this chart, the area of the square is <math>{{I}_{{{R}_{i}}}}\,\!</math>. Finally, the third plot shows the <math>{{I}_{{{R}_{i}}}}(t)\,\!</math> vs. time.		In turn, this can be viewed as either a static plot (at a given time) or as a time-varying plot, as illustrated in the next figures. Specifically, the next three plots present the analysis for three components configured reliability-wise in series following a Weibull distribution with <math>\beta =3\,\!</math> and <math>{{\eta }_{1}}=1,000,\,\!</math> <math>{{\eta }_{2}}=2,000\,\!</math> and <math>{{\eta }_{3}}=3,000\,\!</math>. The first shows a bar chart of <math>{{I}_{{{R}_{i}}}}\,\!</math> while the second shows the <math>{{I}_{{{R}_{i}}}}\,\!</math> in BlockSim's tableau chart format. In this chart, the area of the square is <math>{{I}_{{{R}_{i}}}}\,\!</math>. Finally, the third plot shows the <math>{{I}_{{{R}_{i}}}}(t)\,\!</math> vs. time.

	[[Image:6.3.png\|center\|500px\|Static Reliability Importance plot at ''t''=1,000.]]		[[Image:6.3.png\|center\|500px\|Static Reliability Importance plot at ''t''=1,000.\|link=]]


	[[Image:6_4.png\|center\|500px\|Static Reliability Importance tableau plot at ''t''=1,000.]]		[[Image:6_4.png\|center\|500px\|Static Reliability Importance tableau plot at ''t''=1,000.\|link=]]


	[[Image:6_5.png\|center\|777px\|Reliability Importance vs. time plot.]]		[[Image:6_5.png\|center\|777px\|Reliability Importance vs. time plot.\|link=]]

	===Example===		===Example===

Richard House: /* Static Reliability Importance */

2016-01-04T22:14:10Z

Static Reliability Importance

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:14, 4 January 2016
Line 16:		Line 16:
	The value of the reliability importance given by equation above depends both on the reliability of a component and its corresponding position in the system. In [[RBDs_and_Analytical_System_Reliability#Example_2 \| RBDs and Analytical System Reliability]] we observed that for a simple series system (three components in series with reliabilities of 0.7, 0.8 and 0.9) the rate of increase of the system reliability was greatest when the least reliable component was improved. In other words, it was observed that Component 1 had the largest reliability importance in the system relative to the other two components (see the figure below). The same conclusion can be drawn by using equation above and obtaining the reliability importance in terms of a value for each component.		The value of the reliability importance given by equation above depends both on the reliability of a component and its corresponding position in the system. In [[RBDs_and_Analytical_System_Reliability#Example_2 \| RBDs and Analytical System Reliability]] we observed that for a simple series system (three components in series with reliabilities of 0.7, 0.8 and 0.9) the rate of increase of the system reliability was greatest when the least reliable component was improved. In other words, it was observed that Component 1 had the largest reliability importance in the system relative to the other two components (see the figure below). The same conclusion can be drawn by using equation above and obtaining the reliability importance in terms of a value for each component.

	[[Image:6_1.png\|center\|500px\|Rate of change of system reliability when increasing the reliability of each component.]]		[[Image:6_1.png\|center\|500px\|Rate of change of system reliability when increasing the reliability of each component.\|link=]]

	Using BlockSim, the reliability importance values for these components can be calculated with the equation above. Using the plot option and selecting the Static Reliability Importance plot type, the following chart can be obtained. Note that the time input required to create this plot is irrelevant for this example because the components are static.		Using BlockSim, the reliability importance values for these components can be calculated with the equation above. Using the plot option and selecting the Static Reliability Importance plot type, the following chart can be obtained. Note that the time input required to create this plot is irrelevant for this example because the components are static.

	[[Image:6.2.png\|center\|500px\|Static reliability importance plot.]]		[[Image:6.2.png\|center\|500px\|Static reliability importance plot.\|link=]]

	The values shown for each component were obtained using the equation above. The reliability equation for this series system is given by:		The values shown for each component were obtained using the equation above. The reliability equation for this series system is given by:

Richard House: /* Time-Dependent Reliability Importance */

2016-01-04T22:12:35Z

Time-Dependent Reliability Importance

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:12, 4 January 2016
Line 43:		Line 43:
	In turn, this can be viewed as either a static plot (at a given time) or as a time-varying plot, as illustrated in the next figures. Specifically, the next three plots present the analysis for three components configured reliability-wise in series following a Weibull distribution with <math>\beta =3\,\!</math> and <math>{{\eta }_{1}}=1,000,\,\!</math> <math>{{\eta }_{2}}=2,000\,\!</math> and <math>{{\eta }_{3}}=3,000\,\!</math>. The first shows a bar chart of <math>{{I}_{{{R}_{i}}}}\,\!</math> while the second shows the <math>{{I}_{{{R}_{i}}}}\,\!</math> in BlockSim's tableau chart format. In this chart, the area of the square is <math>{{I}_{{{R}_{i}}}}\,\!</math>. Finally, the third plot shows the <math>{{I}_{{{R}_{i}}}}(t)\,\!</math> vs. time.		In turn, this can be viewed as either a static plot (at a given time) or as a time-varying plot, as illustrated in the next figures. Specifically, the next three plots present the analysis for three components configured reliability-wise in series following a Weibull distribution with <math>\beta =3\,\!</math> and <math>{{\eta }_{1}}=1,000,\,\!</math> <math>{{\eta }_{2}}=2,000\,\!</math> and <math>{{\eta }_{3}}=3,000\,\!</math>. The first shows a bar chart of <math>{{I}_{{{R}_{i}}}}\,\!</math> while the second shows the <math>{{I}_{{{R}_{i}}}}\,\!</math> in BlockSim's tableau chart format. In this chart, the area of the square is <math>{{I}_{{{R}_{i}}}}\,\!</math>. Finally, the third plot shows the <math>{{I}_{{{R}_{i}}}}(t)\,\!</math> vs. time.

	[[Image:6.3.png\|center\|~~350px~~\|Static Reliability Importance plot at ''t''=1,000.]]		[[Image:6.3.png\|center\|500px\|Static Reliability Importance plot at ''t''=1,000.]]


	[[Image:6_4.png\|center\|~~350px~~\|Static Reliability Importance tableau plot at ''t''=1,000.]]		[[Image:6_4.png\|center\|500px\|Static Reliability Importance tableau plot at ''t''=1,000.]]


	[[Image:6_5.png\|center\|~~350px~~\|Reliability Importance vs. time plot.]]		[[Image:6_5.png\|center\|777px\|Reliability Importance vs. time plot.]]

	===Example===		===Example===

Richard House: /* Static Reliability Importance */

2016-01-04T22:11:04Z

Static Reliability Importance

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:11, 4 January 2016
Line 20:		Line 20:
	Using BlockSim, the reliability importance values for these components can be calculated with the equation above. Using the plot option and selecting the Static Reliability Importance plot type, the following chart can be obtained. Note that the time input required to create this plot is irrelevant for this example because the components are static.		Using BlockSim, the reliability importance values for these components can be calculated with the equation above. Using the plot option and selecting the Static Reliability Importance plot type, the following chart can be obtained. Note that the time input required to create this plot is irrelevant for this example because the components are static.

	[[Image:6.2.png\|center\|~~400px~~\|Static reliability importance plot.]]		[[Image:6.2.png\|center\|500px\|Static reliability importance plot.]]

	The values shown for each component were obtained using the equation above. The reliability equation for this series system is given by:		The values shown for each component were obtained using the equation above. The reliability equation for this series system is given by:

Richard House: /* Static Reliability Importance */

2016-01-04T22:10:39Z

Static Reliability Importance

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:10, 4 January 2016
Line 16:		Line 16:
	The value of the reliability importance given by equation above depends both on the reliability of a component and its corresponding position in the system. In [[RBDs_and_Analytical_System_Reliability#Example_2 \| RBDs and Analytical System Reliability]] we observed that for a simple series system (three components in series with reliabilities of 0.7, 0.8 and 0.9) the rate of increase of the system reliability was greatest when the least reliable component was improved. In other words, it was observed that Component 1 had the largest reliability importance in the system relative to the other two components (see the figure below). The same conclusion can be drawn by using equation above and obtaining the reliability importance in terms of a value for each component.		The value of the reliability importance given by equation above depends both on the reliability of a component and its corresponding position in the system. In [[RBDs_and_Analytical_System_Reliability#Example_2 \| RBDs and Analytical System Reliability]] we observed that for a simple series system (three components in series with reliabilities of 0.7, 0.8 and 0.9) the rate of increase of the system reliability was greatest when the least reliable component was improved. In other words, it was observed that Component 1 had the largest reliability importance in the system relative to the other two components (see the figure below). The same conclusion can be drawn by using equation above and obtaining the reliability importance in terms of a value for each component.

	[[Image:6_1.png\|center\|~~400px~~\|Rate of change of system reliability when increasing the reliability of each component.]]		[[Image:6_1.png\|center\|500px\|Rate of change of system reliability when increasing the reliability of each component.]]

	Using BlockSim, the reliability importance values for these components can be calculated with the equation above. Using the plot option and selecting the Static Reliability Importance plot type, the following chart can be obtained. Note that the time input required to create this plot is irrelevant for this example because the components are static.		Using BlockSim, the reliability importance values for these components can be calculated with the equation above. Using the plot option and selecting the Static Reliability Importance plot type, the following chart can be obtained. Note that the time input required to create this plot is irrelevant for this example because the components are static.

Richard House: /* Importance Measures and FMEA/FMECA */

2015-05-04T23:20:24Z

Importance Measures and FMEA/FMECA

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:20, 4 May 2015
Line 55:		Line 55:

	===Importance Measures and FMEA/FMECA===		===Importance Measures and FMEA/FMECA===
	Traditional Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA/FMECA) relies on Risk Priority Numbers (RPNs) or criticality calculations to identify and prioritize the significance/importance of different failure modes. The RPN methodology (and to some extent, the criticality methodology) tend to be subjective. When conducting these types of analyses, one may wish to incorporate more quantitative metrics, such as the importance measures presented here and/or the RS FCI and RS DECI for repairable systems (which are discussed in later chapters). ReliaSoft's [http://www.~~ReliaSoft~~.com/xfmea/~~\|Xfmea~~ software] can be used to export an FMEA/FMECA analysis to BlockSim. The documentation that accompanies Xfmea provides more information on FMEA/FMECA, including both methods of risk assessment.		Traditional Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA/FMECA) relies on Risk Priority Numbers (RPNs) or criticality calculations to identify and prioritize the significance/importance of different failure modes. The RPN methodology (and to some extent, the criticality methodology) tend to be subjective. When conducting these types of analyses, one may wish to incorporate more quantitative metrics, such as the importance measures presented here and/or the RS FCI and RS DECI for repairable systems (which are discussed in later chapters). ReliaSoft's [http://www.reliasoft.com/xfmea/index.htm software] can be used to export an FMEA/FMECA analysis to BlockSim. The documentation that accompanies Xfmea provides more information on FMEA/FMECA, including both methods of risk assessment.

Richard House at 16:05, 21 September 2012

2012-09-21T16:05:45Z

Richard House: /* Static Reliability Importance */

2012-09-05T15:33:09Z

Static Reliability Importance

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:33, 5 September 2012
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Once the reliability of a system has been determined, engineers are often faced with the task of identifying the least reliable component(s) in the system in order to improve the design. For example, it was observed in [[RBDs and Analytical System Reliability]] that the least reliable component in a series system has the biggest effect on the system reliability. In this case, if the reliability of the system is to be improved, then the efforts can best be concentrated on improving the reliability of that component first. In simple systems such as a series system, it is easy to identify the weak components. However, in more complex systems this becomes quite a difficult task. For complex systems, the analyst needs a mathematical approach that will provide the means of identifying and quantifying the importance of each component in the system.		Once the reliability of a system has been determined, engineers are often faced with the task of identifying the least reliable component(s) in the system in order to improve the design. For example, it was observed in [[RBDs and Analytical System Reliability]] that the least reliable component in a series system has the biggest effect on the system reliability. In this case, if the reliability of the system is to be improved, then the efforts can best be concentrated on improving the reliability of that component first. In simple systems such as a series system, it is easy to identify the weak components. However, in more complex systems this becomes quite a difficult task. For complex systems, the analyst needs a mathematical approach that will provide the means of identifying and quantifying the importance of each component in the system.

	Using reliability importance measures is one method of identifying the relative importance of each component in a system with respect to the overall reliability of the system. The reliability importance, <math>{{I}_{R}}\,\!</math> , of component <math>i\,\!</math> in a system of <math>n\,\!</math> components is given by Leemis: [[Appendix_B:_References \| [17]]]		Using reliability importance measures is one method of identifying the relative importance of each component in a system with respect to the overall reliability of the system. The reliability importance, <math>{{I}_{R}}\,\!</math> , of component <math>i\,\!</math> in a system of <math>n\,\!</math> components is given by Leemis [[Appendix_B:_References \| [17]]]:

	::<math>{{I}_{{{R}_{i}}}}=\frac{\partial {{R}_{s}}}{\partial {{R}_{i}}} \ </math>		::<math>{{I}_{{{R}_{i}}}}=\frac{\partial {{R}_{s}}}{\partial {{R}_{i}}} \ </math>

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:05, 21 September 2012
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Once the reliability of a system has been determined, engineers are often faced with the task of identifying the least reliable component(s) in the system in order to improve the design. For example, it was observed in [[RBDs and Analytical System Reliability]] that the least reliable component in a series system has the biggest effect on the system reliability. In this case, if the reliability of the system is to be improved, then the efforts can best be concentrated on improving the reliability of that component first. In simple systems such as a series system, it is easy to identify the weak components. However, in more complex systems this becomes quite a difficult task. For complex systems, the analyst needs a mathematical approach that will provide the means of identifying and quantifying the importance of each component in the system.		Once the reliability of a system has been determined, engineers are often faced with the task of identifying the least reliable component(s) in the system in order to improve the design. For example, it was observed in [[RBDs and Analytical System Reliability]] that the least reliable component in a series system has the biggest effect on the system reliability. In this case, if the reliability of the system is to be improved, then the efforts can best be concentrated on improving the reliability of that component first. In simple systems such as a series system, it is easy to identify the weak components. However, in more complex systems this becomes quite a difficult task. For complex systems, the analyst needs a mathematical approach that will provide the means of identifying and quantifying the importance of each component in the system.

	Using reliability importance measures is one method of identifying the relative importance of each component in a system with respect to the overall reliability of the system. The reliability importance, <math>{{I}_{R}}\,\!</math> , of component <math>i\,\!</math> in a system of <math>n\,\!</math> components is given by Leemis [[Appendix_B:_References \| [17]]]:		Using reliability importance measures is one method of identifying the relative importance of each component in a system with respect to the overall reliability of the system. The reliability importance, <math>{{I}_{R}}\,\!</math>, of component <math>i\,\!</math> in a system of <math>n\,\!</math> components is given by Leemis [[Appendix_B:_References \| [17]]]:

	::<math>{{I}_{{{R}_{i}}}}=\frac{\partial {{R}_{s}}}{\partial {{R}_{i}}} \ </math>		::<math>{{I}_{{{R}_{i}}}}=\frac{\partial {{R}_{s}}}{\partial {{R}_{i}}} \ \,\!</math>

	where:		where:

	:*<math>{{R}_{s}}\,\!</math> is the system reliability.<br>		:*<math>{{R}_{s}}\,\!</math> is the system reliability.<br>
	:*<math>{{R}_{i}}\,\!</math> is the component reliability.<br>		:*<math>{{R}_{i}}\,\!</math> is the component reliability.<br>

	The value of the reliability importance given by equation above depends both on the reliability of a component and its corresponding position in the system. In [[RBDs_and_Analytical_System_Reliability#Example_2 \| RBDs and Analytical System Reliability]] we observed that for a simple series system (three components in series with reliabilities of 0.7, 0.8 and 0.9) the rate of increase of the system reliability was greatest when the least reliable component was improved. In other words, it was observed that Component 1 had the largest reliability importance in the system relative to the other two components (see the figure below). The same conclusion can be drawn by using equation above and obtaining the reliability importance in terms of a value for each component.		The value of the reliability importance given by equation above depends both on the reliability of a component and its corresponding position in the system. In [[RBDs_and_Analytical_System_Reliability#Example_2 \| RBDs and Analytical System Reliability]] we observed that for a simple series system (three components in series with reliabilities of 0.7, 0.8 and 0.9) the rate of increase of the system reliability was greatest when the least reliable component was improved. In other words, it was observed that Component 1 had the largest reliability importance in the system relative to the other two components (see the figure below). The same conclusion can be drawn by using equation above and obtaining the reliability importance in terms of a value for each component.
Line 24:		Line 24:
	The values shown for each component were obtained using the equation above. The reliability equation for this series system is given by:		The values shown for each component were obtained using the equation above. The reliability equation for this series system is given by:

	::<math>{{R}_{_{S}}}={{R}_{1}}\cdot {{R}_{2}}\cdot {{R}_{3}} \ </math>		::<math>{{R}_{_{S}}}={{R}_{1}}\cdot {{R}_{2}}\cdot {{R}_{3}} \ \,\!</math>

	Taking the partial derivative of the equation above with respect to <math>{{R}_{1}}\,\!</math> yields:		Taking the partial derivative of the equation above with respect to <math>{{R}_{1}}\,\!</math> yields:

	::<math>\begin{align}		::<math>\begin{align}
Line 32:		Line 32:
	= & 0.8\cdot 0.9 \\		= & 0.8\cdot 0.9 \\
	= & 0.72		= & 0.72
	\end{align}</math>		\end{align}\,\!</math>

	Thus the reliability importance of Component 1 is <math>{{I}_{{{R}_{1}}}}=</math> 0.72. The reliability importance values for Components 2 and 3 are obtained in a similar manner.		Thus the reliability importance of Component 1 is <math>{{I}_{{{R}_{1}}}}=\,\!</math> 0.72. The reliability importance values for Components 2 and 3 are obtained in a similar manner.

	===Time-Dependent Reliability Importance===		===Time-Dependent Reliability Importance===
	The same concept applies if the components have a time-varying reliability. That is, if <math>{{R}_{s}}(t)={{R}_{1}}(t)\cdot {{R}_{2}}(t)\cdot {{R}_{3}}(t)\,\!</math> , then one could compute <math>{{I}_{{{R}_{i}}}}\,\!</math> at any time <math>x,\,\!</math> or <math>{{I}_{{{R}_{i}}}}{{(t)}_{_{t=x}}}.\,\!</math> This is quantified in the following equation.		The same concept applies if the components have a time-varying reliability. That is, if <math>{{R}_{s}}(t)={{R}_{1}}(t)\cdot {{R}_{2}}(t)\cdot {{R}_{3}}(t)\,\!</math>, then one could compute <math>{{I}_{{{R}_{i}}}}\,\!</math> at any time <math>x,\,\!</math> or <math>{{I}_{{{R}_{i}}}}{{(t)}_{_{t=x}}}.\,\!</math> This is quantified in the following equation.

	::<math>{{I}_{{{R}_{i}}}}(t)=\frac{\partial {{R}_{s}}(t)}{\partial {{R}_{i}}(t)}\ </math>		::<math>{{I}_{{{R}_{i}}}}(t)=\frac{\partial {{R}_{s}}(t)}{\partial {{R}_{i}}(t)}\ \,\!</math>

	In turn, this can be viewed as either a static plot (at a given time) or as a time-varying plot, as illustrated in the next figures. Specifically, the next three plots present the analysis for three components configured reliability-wise in series following a Weibull distribution with <math>\beta =3\,\!</math> and <math>{{\eta }_{1}}=1,000,\,\!</math> <math>{{\eta }_{2}}=2,000\,\!</math> and <math>{{\eta }_{3}}=3,000\,\!</math>. The first shows a bar chart of <math>{{I}_{{{R}_{i}}}}\,\!</math> while the second shows the <math>{{I}_{{{R}_{i}}}}\,\!</math> in BlockSim's tableau chart format. In this chart, the area of the square is <math>{{I}_{{{R}_{i}}}}\,\!</math> . Finally, the third plot shows the <math>{{I}_{{{R}_{i}}}}(t)\,\!</math> vs. time.		In turn, this can be viewed as either a static plot (at a given time) or as a time-varying plot, as illustrated in the next figures. Specifically, the next three plots present the analysis for three components configured reliability-wise in series following a Weibull distribution with <math>\beta =3\,\!</math> and <math>{{\eta }_{1}}=1,000,\,\!</math> <math>{{\eta }_{2}}=2,000\,\!</math> and <math>{{\eta }_{3}}=3,000\,\!</math>. The first shows a bar chart of <math>{{I}_{{{R}_{i}}}}\,\!</math> while the second shows the <math>{{I}_{{{R}_{i}}}}\,\!</math> in BlockSim's tableau chart format. In this chart, the area of the square is <math>{{I}_{{{R}_{i}}}}\,\!</math>. Finally, the third plot shows the <math>{{I}_{{{R}_{i}}}}(t)\,\!</math> vs. time.

	[[Image:6.3.png\|center\|350px\|Static Reliability Importance plot at ''t''=1,000.]]		[[Image:6.3.png\|center\|350px\|Static Reliability Importance plot at ''t''=1,000.]]