Equivalent System Example - Revision history

Lisa Hacker at 20:53, 18 September 2023

2023-09-18T20:53:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:53, 18 September 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<noinclude>{{Banner RGA Examples}}		<noinclude>{{Banner RGA Examples}}
	''This example appears in the [~~[Crow_Extended\|~~Reliability ~~Growth and Repairable System Analysis Reference]~~]''.		''This example appears in the [https://help.reliasoft.com/reference/reliability_growth_and_repairable_system_analysis Reliability growth reference]''.
	</noinclude>		</noinclude>

David J. Groebel at 17:36, 30 May 2014

2014-05-30T17:36:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:36, 30 May 2014
Line 15:		Line 15:
	<li>The next figure illustrates the application of rule #1 for mode BD1. The mode in the equivalent single system is calculated as <math>(75+75+75)=225\,\!</math> or <math>75*3=225.\,\!</math>		<li>The next figure illustrates the application of rule #1 for mode BD1. The mode in the equivalent single system is calculated as <math>(75+75+75)=225\,\!</math> or <math>75*3=225.\,\!</math>

	[[Image:rga9.16.png~~\|thumb~~\|center\|450px~~\|Calculating a BD mode.~~]]		[[Image:rga9.16.png\|center\|450px]]

	The next figure illustrates the application of rule #1 for mode A110. The mode in the equivalent single system is calculated as <math>(280+280+280)=840\,\!</math> or <math>280*3=840.\,\!</math>		The next figure illustrates the application of rule #1 for mode A110. The mode in the equivalent single system is calculated as <math>(280+280+280)=840\,\!</math> or <math>280*3=840.\,\!</math>

	[[Image:rga9.17.png~~\|thumb~~\|center\|450px~~\|Calculating an A mode.~~]]		[[Image:rga9.17.png\|center\|450px]]
	</li>		</li>
	<li>The next figure illustrates the application of rule #2 for the first occurrence of the mode BC10 in system 1. The mode in the equivalent single system is calculated as <math>(150+150+150)=450\,\!</math> or <math>150*3=450.\,\!</math>		<li>The next figure illustrates the application of rule #2 for the first occurrence of the mode BC10 in system 1. The mode in the equivalent single system is calculated as <math>(150+150+150)=450\,\!</math> or <math>150*3=450.\,\!</math>

	[[Image:rga9.18.png~~\|thumb~~\|center\|~~400px\|Calculating a BC mode that occurred before an implemented fix.~~]]		[[Image:rga9.18.png\|center\|450px]]

	</li>		</li>

David J. Groebel at 17:35, 30 May 2014

2014-05-30T17:35:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:35, 30 May 2014
Line 6:		Line 6:
	Consider the data set shown in the following figure. <!-- IMPORTANT: If you edit the data in this example, you must edit the reference to the results in Crow_Extended#Transferring_Data_to_an_Equivalent_Single_System-->		Consider the data set shown in the following figure. <!-- IMPORTANT: If you edit the data in this example, you must edit the reference to the results in Crow_Extended#Transferring_Data_to_an_Equivalent_Single_System-->

	[[Image:rga9.15.png\|center\|~~500px\|Three systems with event codes.~~]]		[[Image:rga9.15.png\|center\|600px]]

	'''Solution'''		'''Solution'''
Line 15:		Line 15:
	<li>The next figure illustrates the application of rule #1 for mode BD1. The mode in the equivalent single system is calculated as <math>(75+75+75)=225\,\!</math> or <math>75*3=225.\,\!</math>		<li>The next figure illustrates the application of rule #1 for mode BD1. The mode in the equivalent single system is calculated as <math>(75+75+75)=225\,\!</math> or <math>75*3=225.\,\!</math>

	[[Image:rga9.16.png\|thumb\|center\|~~400px~~\|Calculating a BD mode.]]		[[Image:rga9.16.png\|thumb\|center\|450px\|Calculating a BD mode.]]

	The next figure illustrates the application of rule #1 for mode A110. The mode in the equivalent single system is calculated as <math>(280+280+280)=840\,\!</math> or <math>280*3=840.\,\!</math>		The next figure illustrates the application of rule #1 for mode A110. The mode in the equivalent single system is calculated as <math>(280+280+280)=840\,\!</math> or <math>280*3=840.\,\!</math>

	[[Image:rga9.17.png\|thumb\|center\|~~400px~~\|Calculating an A mode.]]		[[Image:rga9.17.png\|thumb\|center\|450px\|Calculating an A mode.]]
	</li>		</li>
	<li>The next figure illustrates the application of rule #2 for the first occurrence of the mode BC10 in system 1. The mode in the equivalent single system is calculated as <math>(150+150+150)=450\,\!</math> or <math>150*3=450.\,\!</math>		<li>The next figure illustrates the application of rule #2 for the first occurrence of the mode BC10 in system 1. The mode in the equivalent single system is calculated as <math>(150+150+150)=450\,\!</math> or <math>150*3=450.\,\!</math>
Line 28:		Line 28:
	<li>The next figure illustrates the application of rule #3 for implemented fixes (''I'' events) of the mode BC10. In the graph, the ''I'' events are symbolized by having the letter "I" before the naming of the mode. In this case, IBC10 is for the implemented fix of mode BC10. The IBC10 in the equivalent single system is calculated as <math>(200+175+200)=575\,\!</math>.		<li>The next figure illustrates the application of rule #3 for implemented fixes (''I'' events) of the mode BC10. In the graph, the ''I'' events are symbolized by having the letter "I" before the naming of the mode. In this case, IBC10 is for the implemented fix of mode BC10. The IBC10 in the equivalent single system is calculated as <math>(200+175+200)=575\,\!</math>.

	[[Image:rga9.19.png~~\|thumb~~\|center\|~~400px\|Calculating an implementation event.~~]]		[[Image:rga9.19.png\|center\|450px]]

	</li>		</li>
	<li>The next figure illustrates the application of rule #4 for the mode BC20 in system 1, which occurs after a fix for the same mode was implemented in system 2. The mode in the equivalent single system is calculated as <math>(350+300+350)=1000.\,\!</math>		<li>The next figure illustrates the application of rule #4 for the mode BC20 in system 1, which occurs after a fix for the same mode was implemented in system 2. The mode in the equivalent single system is calculated as <math>(350+300+350)=1000.\,\!</math>

	[[Image:rga9.20.png~~\|thumb~~\|center\|~~400px\|Calculating a BC mode that occurred after I events.~~]]		[[Image:rga9.20.png\|center\|450px]]

	</li>		</li>
	<li>The next figure illustrates the application of rule #5 for the second occurrence of the mode BC10 in system 1, which occurs after an implemented fix (''I'' event) has occurred for that mode in the same system. The mode in the equivalent single system is calculated as <math>575+(175+200+175)=1125.\,\!</math>		<li>The next figure illustrates the application of rule #5 for the second occurrence of the mode BC10 in system 1, which occurs after an implemented fix (''I'' event) has occurred for that mode in the same system. The mode in the equivalent single system is calculated as <math>575+(175+200+175)=1125.\,\!</math>

	[[Image:rga9.21.png~~\|thumb~~\|center\|~~400px\|Calculating a second occurrence of a BC mode in the same system, after I events have been implemented.~~]]		[[Image:rga9.21.png\|center\|450px]]

	After having transferred the data set to the Crow Extended equivalent system, the data set is analyzed using the Crow Extended model. The last figure shows the growth potential MTBF plot.		After having transferred the data set to the Crow Extended equivalent system, the data set is analyzed using the Crow Extended model. The last figure shows the growth potential MTBF plot.

	[[Image:rga9.22.png~~\|thumb~~\|center\|~~400px\|Growth Potential MTBF plot from three systems with event codes.~~]]		[[Image:rga9.22.png\|center\|450px]]
	</li>		</li>
	</ol>		</ol>

Chris Kahn at 21:01, 6 February 2014

2014-02-06T21:01:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:01, 6 February 2014
Line 12:		Line 12:
	The first step to creating the equivalent system is to isolate each failure mode and its implemented fixes independently from each other. The numbered steps follow the five rules <noinclude>mentioned in the article [[Crow_Extended#Equivalent_Single_System\|Equivalent Single System]]</noinclude> and are presented in the same numbering sequence.		The first step to creating the equivalent system is to isolate each failure mode and its implemented fixes independently from each other. The numbered steps follow the five rules <noinclude>mentioned in the article [[Crow_Extended#Equivalent_Single_System\|Equivalent Single System]]</noinclude> and are presented in the same numbering sequence.

	1) The next figure illustrates the application of rule #1 for mode BD1. The mode in the equivalent single system is calculated as <math>(75+75+75)=225\,\!</math> or <math>75*3=225.\,\!</math>		<ol>
			<li>The next figure illustrates the application of rule #1 for mode BD1. The mode in the equivalent single system is calculated as <math>(75+75+75)=225\,\!</math> or <math>75*3=225.\,\!</math>

	[[Image:rga9.16.png\|thumb\|center\|400px\|Calculating a BD mode.]]		[[Image:rga9.16.png\|thumb\|center\|400px\|Calculating a BD mode.]]
Line 19:		Line 20:

	[[Image:rga9.17.png\|thumb\|center\|400px\|Calculating an A mode.]]		[[Image:rga9.17.png\|thumb\|center\|400px\|Calculating an A mode.]]
			</li>
	2) The next figure illustrates the application of rule #2 for the first occurrence of the mode BC10 in system 1. The mode in the equivalent single system is calculated as <math>(150+150+150)=450\,\!</math> or <math>150*3=450.\,\!</math>		<li>The next figure illustrates the application of rule #2 for the first occurrence of the mode BC10 in system 1. The mode in the equivalent single system is calculated as <math>(150+150+150)=450\,\!</math> or <math>150*3=450.\,\!</math>

	[[Image:rga9.18.png\|thumb\|center\|400px\|Calculating a BC mode that occurred before an implemented fix.]]		[[Image:rga9.18.png\|thumb\|center\|400px\|Calculating a BC mode that occurred before an implemented fix.]]

	3) The next figure illustrates the application of rule #3 for implemented fixes (''I'' events) of the mode BC10. In the graph, the ''I'' events are symbolized by having the letter "I" before the naming of the mode. In this case, IBC10 is for the implemented fix of mode BC10. The IBC10 in the equivalent single system is calculated as <math>(200+175+200)=575\,\!</math>.		</li>
			<li>The next figure illustrates the application of rule #3 for implemented fixes (''I'' events) of the mode BC10. In the graph, the ''I'' events are symbolized by having the letter "I" before the naming of the mode. In this case, IBC10 is for the implemented fix of mode BC10. The IBC10 in the equivalent single system is calculated as <math>(200+175+200)=575\,\!</math>.

	[[Image:rga9.19.png\|thumb\|center\|400px\|Calculating an implementation event.]]		[[Image:rga9.19.png\|thumb\|center\|400px\|Calculating an implementation event.]]

	4) The next figure illustrates the application of rule #4 for the mode BC20 in system 1, which occurs after a fix for the same mode was implemented in system 2. The mode in the equivalent single system is calculated as <math>(350+300+350)=1000.\,\!</math>		</li>
			<li>The next figure illustrates the application of rule #4 for the mode BC20 in system 1, which occurs after a fix for the same mode was implemented in system 2. The mode in the equivalent single system is calculated as <math>(350+300+350)=1000.\,\!</math>

	[[Image:rga9.20.png\|thumb\|center\|400px\|Calculating a BC mode that occurred after I events.]]		[[Image:rga9.20.png\|thumb\|center\|400px\|Calculating a BC mode that occurred after I events.]]

	5) The next figure illustrates the application of rule #5 for the second occurrence of the mode BC10 in system 1, which occurs after an implemented fix (''I'' event) has occurred for that mode in the same system. The mode in the equivalent single system is calculated as <math>575+(175+200+175)=1125.\,\!</math>		</li>
			<li>The next figure illustrates the application of rule #5 for the second occurrence of the mode BC10 in system 1, which occurs after an implemented fix (''I'' event) has occurred for that mode in the same system. The mode in the equivalent single system is calculated as <math>575+(175+200+175)=1125.\,\!</math>

	[[Image:rga9.21.png\|thumb\|center\|400px\|Calculating a second occurrence of a BC mode in the same system, after I events have been implemented.]]		[[Image:rga9.21.png\|thumb\|center\|400px\|Calculating a second occurrence of a BC mode in the same system, after I events have been implemented.]]
Line 39:		Line 43:

	[[Image:rga9.22.png\|thumb\|center\|400px\|Growth Potential MTBF plot from three systems with event codes.]]		[[Image:rga9.22.png\|thumb\|center\|400px\|Growth Potential MTBF plot from three systems with event codes.]]
			</li>
			</ol>

David J. Groebel at 18:23, 27 January 2014

2014-01-27T18:23:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:23, 27 January 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<noinclude>{{Banner RGA Examples}}		<noinclude>{{Banner RGA Examples}}
			''This example appears in the [[Crow_Extended\|Reliability Growth and Repairable System Analysis Reference]]''.
	''This example appears in the [[Crow_Extended\|Reliability Growth and Repairable System Analysis Reference]]''.</noinclude>		</noinclude>

	<noinclude>This example uses the Multiple with Event Codes data type to demonstrate how implemented fixes (I events) are taken into account when building an equivalent system.</noinclude>		<noinclude>This example uses the Multiple with Event Codes data type to demonstrate how implemented fixes (I events) are taken into account when building an equivalent system.</noinclude>

David J. Groebel at 18:22, 27 January 2014

2014-01-27T18:22:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:22, 27 January 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<noinclude>{{Banner RGA Examples}}		<noinclude>{{Banner RGA Examples}}

	''This example appears in the [[Crow_Extended\|Reliability Growth and Repairable System Analysis Reference]]''.</noinclude>		''This example appears in the [[Crow_Extended\|Reliability Growth and Repairable System Analysis Reference]]''.</noinclude>

David J. Groebel at 18:14, 27 January 2014

2014-01-27T18:14:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:14, 27 January 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<noinclude>{{Banner RGA Examples}}		<noinclude>{{Banner RGA Examples}}
	''This example appears in the [[Crow_Extended\|Reliability Growth and Repairable System Analysis Reference]]''.</noinclude>		''This example appears in the [[Crow_Extended\|Reliability Growth and Repairable System Analysis Reference]]''.</noinclude>


	<noinclude>This example uses the Multiple with Event Codes data type to demonstrate how implemented fixes (I events) are taken into account when building an equivalent system.</noinclude>		<noinclude>This example uses the Multiple with Event Codes data type to demonstrate how implemented fixes (I events) are taken into account when building an equivalent system.</noinclude>
Line 12:		Line 11:
	The first step to creating the equivalent system is to isolate each failure mode and its implemented fixes independently from each other. The numbered steps follow the five rules <noinclude>mentioned in the article [[Crow_Extended#Equivalent_Single_System\|Equivalent Single System]]</noinclude> and are presented in the same numbering sequence.		The first step to creating the equivalent system is to isolate each failure mode and its implemented fixes independently from each other. The numbered steps follow the five rules <noinclude>mentioned in the article [[Crow_Extended#Equivalent_Single_System\|Equivalent Single System]]</noinclude> and are presented in the same numbering sequence.

	:1. The next figure illustrates the application of rule #1 for mode BD1. The mode in the equivalent single system is calculated as <math>(75+75+75)=225\,\!</math> or <math>75*3=225.\,\!</math>		1) The next figure illustrates the application of rule #1 for mode BD1. The mode in the equivalent single system is calculated as <math>(75+75+75)=225\,\!</math> or <math>75*3=225.\,\!</math>

	[[Image:rga9.16.png\|thumb\|center\|400px\|Calculating a BD mode.]]		[[Image:rga9.16.png\|thumb\|center\|400px\|Calculating a BD mode.]]

			The next figure illustrates the application of rule #1 for mode A110. The mode in the equivalent single system is calculated as <math>(280+280+280)=840\,\!</math> or <math>280*3=840.\,\!</math>
	::The next figure illustrates the application of rule #1 for mode A110. The mode in the equivalent single system is calculated as <math>(280+280+280)=840\,\!</math> or <math>280*3=840.\,\!</math>

	[[Image:rga9.17.png\|thumb\|center\|400px\|Calculating an A mode.]]		[[Image:rga9.17.png\|thumb\|center\|400px\|Calculating an A mode.]]

			2) The next figure illustrates the application of rule #2 for the first occurrence of the mode BC10 in system 1. The mode in the equivalent single system is calculated as <math>(150+150+150)=450\,\!</math> or <math>150*3=450.\,\!</math>
	:2. The next figure illustrates the application of rule #2 for the first occurrence of the mode BC10 in system 1. The mode in the equivalent single system is calculated as <math>(150+150+150)=450\,\!</math> or <math>150*3=450.\,\!</math>

	[[Image:rga9.18.png\|thumb\|center\|400px\|Calculating a BC mode that occurred before an implemented fix.]]		[[Image:rga9.18.png\|thumb\|center\|400px\|Calculating a BC mode that occurred before an implemented fix.]]

			3) The next figure illustrates the application of rule #3 for implemented fixes (''I'' events) of the mode BC10. In the graph, the ''I'' events are symbolized by having the letter "I" before the naming of the mode. In this case, IBC10 is for the implemented fix of mode BC10. The IBC10 in the equivalent single system is calculated as <math>(200+175+200)=575\,\!</math>.
	:3. The next figure illustrates the application of rule #3 for implemented fixes (''I'' events) of the mode BC10. In the graph, the ''I'' events are symbolized by having the letter "I" before the naming of the mode. In this case, IBC10 is for the implemented fix of mode BC10. The IBC10 in the equivalent single system is calculated as <math>(200+175+200)=575\,\!</math>.

	[[Image:rga9.19.png\|thumb\|center\|400px\|Calculating an implementation event.]]		[[Image:rga9.19.png\|thumb\|center\|400px\|Calculating an implementation event.]]

			4) The next figure illustrates the application of rule #4 for the mode BC20 in system 1, which occurs after a fix for the same mode was implemented in system 2. The mode in the equivalent single system is calculated as <math>(350+300+350)=1000.\,\!</math>
	:4. The next figure illustrates the application of rule #4 for the mode BC20 in system 1, which occurs after a fix for the same mode was implemented in system 2. The mode in the equivalent single system is calculated as <math>(350+300+350)=1000.\,\!</math>

	[[Image:rga9.20.png\|thumb\|center\|400px\|Calculating a BC mode that occurred after I events.]]		[[Image:rga9.20.png\|thumb\|center\|400px\|Calculating a BC mode that occurred after I events.]]

			5) The next figure illustrates the application of rule #5 for the second occurrence of the mode BC10 in system 1, which occurs after an implemented fix (''I'' event) has occurred for that mode in the same system. The mode in the equivalent single system is calculated as <math>575+(175+200+175)=1125.\,\!</math>
	:5. The next figure illustrates the application of rule #5 for the second occurrence of the mode BC10 in system 1, which occurs after an implemented fix (''I'' event) has occurred for that mode in the same system. The mode in the equivalent single system is calculated as <math>575+(175+200+175)=1125.\,\!</math>

	[[Image:rga9.21.png\|thumb\|center\|400px\|Calculating a second occurrence of a BC mode in the same system, after I events have been implemented.]]		[[Image:rga9.21.png\|thumb\|center\|400px\|Calculating a second occurrence of a BC mode in the same system, after I events have been implemented.]]


	After having transferred the data set to the Crow Extended equivalent system, the data set is analyzed using the Crow Extended model. The last figure shows the growth potential MTBF plot.		After having transferred the data set to the Crow Extended equivalent system, the data set is analyzed using the Crow Extended model. The last figure shows the growth potential MTBF plot.

	[[Image:rga9.22.png\|thumb\|center\|400px\|Growth Potential MTBF plot from three systems with event codes.]]		[[Image:rga9.22.png\|thumb\|center\|400px\|Growth Potential MTBF plot from three systems with event codes.]]

Kate Racaza at 20:02, 20 January 2014

2014-01-20T20:02:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:02, 20 January 2014
Line 4:		Line 4:

	<noinclude>This example uses the Multiple with Event Codes data type to demonstrate how implemented fixes (I events) are taken into account when building an equivalent system.</noinclude>		<noinclude>This example uses the Multiple with Event Codes data type to demonstrate how implemented fixes (I events) are taken into account when building an equivalent system.</noinclude>
	Consider the data set shown in the following figure.		Consider the data set shown in the following figure. <!-- IMPORTANT: If you edit the data in this example, you must edit the reference to the results in Crow_Extended#Transferring_Data_to_an_Equivalent_Single_System-->

	[[Image:rga9.15.png\|center\|500px\|Three systems with event codes.]]		[[Image:rga9.15.png\|center\|500px\|Three systems with event codes.]]

Kate Racaza at 22:19, 4 February 2013

2013-02-04T22:19:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:19, 4 February 2013
Line 3:		Line 3:


	<noinclude>This example uses the Multiple with Event Codes data type to demonstrate how implemented fixes (I events) are taken into account when building an equivalent system.</noinclude> Consider the data set shown in the following figure.		<noinclude>This example uses the Multiple with Event Codes data type to demonstrate how implemented fixes (I events) are taken into account when building an equivalent system.</noinclude>
			Consider the data set shown in the following figure.

	[[Image:rga9.15.png\|center\|500px\|Three systems with event codes.]]		[[Image:rga9.15.png\|center\|500px\|Three systems with event codes.]]

Kate Racaza at 22:15, 4 February 2013

2013-02-04T22:15:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:15, 4 February 2013
Line 3:		Line 3:


	This example uses the Multiple with Event Codes data type to demonstrate how implemented fixes (I events) are taken into account when building an equivalent system. Consider the data set shown in the following figure.		<noinclude>This example uses the Multiple with Event Codes data type to demonstrate how implemented fixes (I events) are taken into account when building an equivalent system.</noinclude> Consider the data set shown in the following figure.

	[[Image:rga9.15.png\|center\|500px\|Three systems with event codes.]]		[[Image:rga9.15.png\|center\|500px\|Three systems with event codes.]]
Line 9:		Line 9:
	'''Solution'''		'''Solution'''

	The first step to creating the equivalent system is to isolate each failure mode and its implemented fixes independently from each other. The numbered ~~items~~ follow the five rules <noinclude>mentioned in the article [[Crow_Extended#Equivalent_Single_System\|Equivalent Single System]]</noinclude> and are presented in the same numbering sequence.		The first step to creating the equivalent system is to isolate each failure mode and its implemented fixes independently from each other. The numbered steps follow the five rules <noinclude>mentioned in the article [[Crow_Extended#Equivalent_Single_System\|Equivalent Single System]]</noinclude> and are presented in the same numbering sequence.

	:1. The next figure illustrates the application of rule #1 for mode BD1. The mode in the equivalent single system is calculated as <math>(75+75+75)=225\,\!</math> or <math>75*3=225.\,\!</math>		:1. The next figure illustrates the application of rule #1 for mode BD1. The mode in the equivalent single system is calculated as <math>(75+75+75)=225\,\!</math> or <math>75*3=225.\,\!</math>
Line 16:		Line 16:


	::~~While the~~ next figure illustrates the application of rule #1 for mode A110. The mode in the equivalent single system is calculated as <math>(280+280+280)=840\,\!</math> or <math>280*3=840.\,\!</math>		::The next figure illustrates the application of rule #1 for mode A110. The mode in the equivalent single system is calculated as <math>(280+280+280)=840\,\!</math> or <math>280*3=840.\,\!</math>

	[[Image:rga9.17.png\|thumb\|center\|400px\|Calculating an A mode.]]		[[Image:rga9.17.png\|thumb\|center\|400px\|Calculating an A mode.]]