1P Exponential Example: Difference between revisions

From ReliaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Banner Weibull Examples}}
<noinclude>{{Banner Weibull Examples}}
'''One Parameter Exponential Probability Plot Example'''
''This example appears in the [https://help.reliasoft.com/reference/life_data_analysis Life data analysis reference]''.
</noinclude>
'''1-Parameter Exponential Probability Plot Example'''


Six units are put on a life test and tested to failure. The failure times are 7, 12, 19, 29, 41, and 67 hours.  Estimate the failure rate parameter for a one-parameter exponential distribution using the probability plotting method.
6 units are put on a life test and tested to failure. The failure times are 7, 12, 19, 29, 41, and 67 hours.  Estimate the failure rate for a 1-parameter exponential distribution using the probability plotting method.


'''Solution'''
In order to plot the points for the probability plot, the appropriate reliability estimate values must be obtained.  These will be equivalent to <math>100%-MR\,\!</math> since the y-axis represents the reliability and the <math>MR\,\!</math> values represent unreliability estimates.


In order to plot the points for the probability plot, the appropriate reliability estimate values must be obtainedThese will be equivalent to <math>100%-MR</math>, since the y-axis represents the reliability and the <math>MR</math> values represent unreliability estimates.
<center><math>\begin{matrix}
  \text{Time-to-failure, hr}  & \text{Reliability Estimate, }%  \\
  7  & 100-10.91=89.09%  \\
  12  & 100-26.44=73.56%  \\
  19  & 100-42.14=57.86%  \\
  29  & 100-57.86=42.14% \\
  41  & 100-73.56=26.44% \\
  67  & 100-89.09=10.91%  \\
\end{matrix}\,\!</math></center>


<center><math>\begin{matrix}
Next, these points are plotted on an exponential probability plotting paper. A sample of this type of plotting paper is shown next, with the sample points in place. Notice how these points describe a line with a negative slope.
  \text{Time-to-} & \text{Reliability}  \\
  \text{failure, hr} & \text{Estimate, }%  \\
  7 & 100-10.91=89.09%  \\
  12 & 100-26.44=73.56%  \\
  19 & 100-42.14=57.86%  \\
  29 & 100-57.86=42.14%  \\
  41 & 100-73.56=26.44%  \\
  67 & 100-89.09=10.91%  \\
\end{matrix}</math></center>


[[Image:weibull EPP.png|center|400px|]]


Next, these points are plotted on exponential probability plotting paper. A sample of this type of plotting paper is shown next, with the sample points in place. Notice how these points describe a line with a negative slope.
Once the points are plotted, draw the best possible straight line through these points. The time value at which this line intersects with a horizontal line drawn at the 36.8% reliability mark is the mean life, and the reciprocal of this is the failure rate <math>\lambda\,\!</math>.
Once the points are plotted, draw the best possible straight line through these points. The time value at which this line intersects with a horizontal line drawn at the 36.8% reliability mark is the mean life, and the reciprocal of this is the failure rate <math>\lambda </math>.
This is because at <math>t=m=\tfrac{1}{\lambda }\,\!</math>:
This is because at <math>t=m=\tfrac{1}{\lambda }</math>:


::<math>\begin{align}
::<math>\begin{align}
Line 28: Line 29:
   R(t)= & {{e}^{-\lambda \cdot \tfrac{1}{\lambda }}} \\  
   R(t)= & {{e}^{-\lambda \cdot \tfrac{1}{\lambda }}} \\  
   R(t)= & {{e}^{-1}}=0.368=36.8%.   
   R(t)= & {{e}^{-1}}=0.368=36.8%.   
\end{align}</math>
\end{align}\,\!</math>
 
These steps are shown graphically in the next pages.
 
[[Image:weibull EPP.png|center|400px|]]
 
As can be seen in the plot below, the best-fit line through the data points crosses the <math>R=36.8%</math> line at <math>t=33</math> hours.


The following plot shows that the best-fit line through the data points crosses the <math>R=36.8%\,\!</math> line at <math>t=33\,\!</math> hours. And because <math>\tfrac{1}{\lambda }=33\,\!</math> hours, <math>\lambda =0.0303\,\!</math> failures/hour.
[[Image:weibull EPP2.png|center|400px|]]
[[Image:weibull EPP2.png|center|400px|]]
Since <math>\tfrac{1}{\lambda }=33</math> hours, <math>\lambda =0.0303</math> failures/hour.

Latest revision as of 21:44, 18 September 2023

Weibull Examples Banner.png


New format available! This reference is now available in a new format that offers faster page load, improved display for calculations and images and more targeted search.

As of January 2024, this Reliawiki page will not continue to be updated. Please update all links and bookmarks to the latest references at Weibull examples and Weibull reference examples.




This example appears in the Life data analysis reference.

1-Parameter Exponential Probability Plot Example

6 units are put on a life test and tested to failure. The failure times are 7, 12, 19, 29, 41, and 67 hours. Estimate the failure rate for a 1-parameter exponential distribution using the probability plotting method.

In order to plot the points for the probability plot, the appropriate reliability estimate values must be obtained. These will be equivalent to [math]\displaystyle{ 100%-MR\,\! }[/math] since the y-axis represents the reliability and the [math]\displaystyle{ MR\,\! }[/math] values represent unreliability estimates.

[math]\displaystyle{ \begin{matrix} \text{Time-to-failure, hr} & \text{Reliability Estimate, }% \\ 7 & 100-10.91=89.09% \\ 12 & 100-26.44=73.56% \\ 19 & 100-42.14=57.86% \\ 29 & 100-57.86=42.14% \\ 41 & 100-73.56=26.44% \\ 67 & 100-89.09=10.91% \\ \end{matrix}\,\! }[/math]

Next, these points are plotted on an exponential probability plotting paper. A sample of this type of plotting paper is shown next, with the sample points in place. Notice how these points describe a line with a negative slope.

Weibull EPP.png

Once the points are plotted, draw the best possible straight line through these points. The time value at which this line intersects with a horizontal line drawn at the 36.8% reliability mark is the mean life, and the reciprocal of this is the failure rate [math]\displaystyle{ \lambda\,\! }[/math]. This is because at [math]\displaystyle{ t=m=\tfrac{1}{\lambda }\,\! }[/math]:

[math]\displaystyle{ \begin{align} R(t)= & {{e}^{-\lambda \cdot t}} \\ R(t)= & {{e}^{-\lambda \cdot \tfrac{1}{\lambda }}} \\ R(t)= & {{e}^{-1}}=0.368=36.8%. \end{align}\,\! }[/math]

The following plot shows that the best-fit line through the data points crosses the [math]\displaystyle{ R=36.8%\,\! }[/math] line at [math]\displaystyle{ t=33\,\! }[/math] hours. And because [math]\displaystyle{ \tfrac{1}{\lambda }=33\,\! }[/math] hours, [math]\displaystyle{ \lambda =0.0303\,\! }[/math] failures/hour.

Weibull EPP2.png